I cant imagine what possible solution any consultant could come up with that would suggest TSRA can somehow become reconstructed & renovated to make it hockey friendly without a total & complete gut job to the place, basically the cost of a new building... nor can I imagine any suggestion that Sarver relinquish revenues in order to accommodate the Coyotes be met with anything but no way, not happening.
If these consultants were being honest, realistic, theyd understand that the business models of these two franchises under separate ownership groups is a hurdle that cannot be overcome. That the costs to renovate TSRA would more than double the costs that might or might not satisfy Sarver's interests as they relate specifically to the NBA & the Suns.
Its my understanding that the report deals exclusively with TSRA, not with the option, feasibility study pursuant to a new dual purpose shared facility, and what method, what new business model they think workable that would be feasible & acceptable to both teams who as of right now have dueling non complimentary & competitive objectives.
That they'd refuse to disclose those facts to the public is frankly rather strange, bizarre. That "negotiations" are under way & to release this report could prove harmful to the process must mean that its NBA & subsidy heavy, that if people knew what was going on they might get upset. That it puts paid to the ultruistic fiction espoused by the outgoing Mayor's suggestions that a shared facility was ever even possible. All seems very odd.