Gentle Man
09/12
Good for him. He's done well in Vegas. They'll most likely make the playoffs.
Please don't think the reason why we are where we are is because we don't have Gallant. He has nothing to do with our mediocre goaltending, crap bottom 6/9, chemistry-less second line, and inexperienced d-core, plus cap limited team. We're in a transition year, again, because of Tallon and Viola.
Gallant should thank Tallon for giving him March and Smith for nothing though
Funny though that Debeor, a guy people hated on big time never gets any love around here despite taking two teams to the cup. Rather have him back.
Already discussed in the previous thread. You can think what you want.
Hell, watching Vegas and the words that people describe his team. They are hard to play against. Fun to watch etc. All phrases that we heard about THIS TEAM when he was here.
Hell, it might not even be about the players lost per se. People can think what they want about Gudbranson and Kulikov, Logan Shaw etc, maybe it's not their skills or abilities as players but perhaps their buy-in.
Lets draw a comparison here. The Miami Heat are league-known for EXHAUSTIVE practices ever since Pat Riley joined the club in 95-96. This isnt popular with players at all, however, this was a way for Riley and the organization to know who belongs and who doesnt. It's a culture.
The players bought it? Guess they didnt buy in. They really werent expected to though as Gallant wasnt coaching how he wanted to anymore. Yandle hard to play against? Demers? Pysyk? All better players than the guys lost? Sure. Absolutely. But they definitely didnt buy in to what Gallant wants. Likely because they arent those type of players. Oh Well.
The players Gallant didnt have bought in to how he wanted to play similar to how the Vegas players are buying in. They had an identity.
Think what you want. Keep discounting Gallant. That's fine. I thought Deboer was fine too, but he did take 2 teams with Hall of Famers to cups. He didnt do much here.