swiftwin
★SUMMER.OF.PIERRE★
- Jul 26, 2005
- 23,649
- 13,119
In the interview, he makes the distinction. First he says that it was clear that Arizona didn't want to take any money back. He then says that Pierre put in an offer that didn't send any money to Arizona because the Sens had the cap space. He then says that the "quid pro quo" was that Chychrun's camp wanted Chychrun to go "somewhere further along in the process" (ie. further along in the rebuild), then he says there were other teams that were "willing to do the same deal" or even "a better haul for Arizona", "so credit to Bill for honoring the agreement" (to send Chrychrun to a team that's "further along").I cant listen right now but I thought the "better offers" referred to offers that had better assets but also included salary.
That said, I am sure there was some incentive to get the deal done with Ottawa for the reasons you state. Andy Scott is also an Ottawa boy, has spent probably 40 or his 45ish years here, and I can't help but think that he greased the wheels a bit, too.
Ultimately, however, I think the big issue was salary.
This lines up with Adams' complaint. My guess is that the Ottawa and Buffalo offers both included their 1st rounders, but maybe Buffalo's included an extra late pick or prospect or something. But maybe Armstrong justified it by the fact that Ottawa's 1st round pick was technically higher than Buffalo's at the time of the trade, but Adams didn't see it that way and considered both 1st rounders equivalent.