Avery Rule
Registered User
- Jun 1, 2010
- 1,046
- 194
Helms contract is that gross.
I love it.
it really is crazy how much a year can change things. mrazek goes from being regarded as a potential franchise goalie to not even being selected in the expansion draft
it really is crazy how much a year can change things. mrazek goes from being regarded as a potential franchise goalie to not even being selected in the expansion draft
Not as obvious as you'd think if you poll 100 Red Wing fansi knew they weren't touching Mrazek. It was obvious. I predicted they'd take Sheahan. I forgot Nosek even existed, AHL/NHL tweener. Lol
I'm stewing over NSH losing James Neal.
His list is one of the first times he had to be honest publicly. He also went out of his way to say he had no idea what they would do. To top that off he completely eviscerated the value of one of the only players we thought had any in the organization and has made that one of the most untenable relationships in the league.
Sweet job Ken, spin this anyway you care to, I have lost all faith in him moving forward. That doesn't change because he got lucky today. There was a way to do this and he failed miserably. It is time to move upstairs or somewhere else.
So Vegas didn't take Mrazek because Holland eviscerated his value with his media cronies and their character assassination? Really man?
Howard wasn't going to get taken. Mrazek wasn't going to get taken. So why take the symbolic step of exposing Mrazek, not making a side deal, and basically announcing to the NHL world "I don't care if I lose him for nothing or not?" Is it that hard to understand the point?
If its true that Mrazek has "attitude problems," let everyone else figure that out for themselves! Continue to paint him as a young, potential starter who just needs to work out some kinks and maybe you won't entirely eviscerate his value, as said.
Why?Howard wasn't going to get taken. Mrazek wasn't going to get taken. So why take the symbolic step of exposing Mrazek, not making a side deal, and basically announcing to the NHL world "I don't care if I lose him for nothing or not?" Is it that hard to understand the point?
If its true that Mrazek has "attitude problems," let everyone else figure that out for themselves! Continue to paint him as a young, potential starter who just needs to work out some kinks and maybe you won't entirely eviscerate his value, as said.
Not as obvious as you'd think if you poll 100 Red Wing fans