eh sure i'll take it
been curious to see how it works
Aights, I'll send you a PM with the Key.
Why must Tom Cruise be in every movie I find remotely interesting any more? Still haven't watched Reacher or Oblivion.
Why must Tom Cruise be in every movie I find remotely interesting any more? Still haven't watched Reacher or Oblivion.
My friend (Bears/Chicago sports fan) and I are debating whether the Bears should go with Cutler or McCown next week after Urlacher said he'd start McCown.
I'd personally keep McCown in, that offensive machine's been rolling lately under his leadership. The friend says Cutler has more talent than McCown, and should be able to thrive immediately in that offense right where McCown left off.
So, I've got two questions for debate here:
1. If you were Trestman, would you dress McCown or Cutler next week?
And then a hypothetical:
2. With the weapons on the Bears offense (Marshall, Jeffery, Forte), do you think it would be possible for an awful QB like Blaine Gabbert (sorry, CI) to succeed on the Bears? Note: For this, I just mean succeed offensively, so don't factor in the Bears awful rush defense into the equation for "succeed".
Reacher was ok, although the character is supposed to be about 6'5" and 240lbs. Kinda killed credibility with fans of the books, of which I am one.
So Head Goose. That statics test was about 5000 times worse than what I thought it would be.
And to answer your question, I'd stick with McCown. And I'm not sold that the offense could perform as well with a different quarterback (disclaimer: I have not watched a single Bears game).
Sorry to hear that about your statics test.
If it's any consolation prize...once again, for the third straight semester, I had an A- going into a final for a math-based class (differential equations 2 this time), and ended up with my grade dropping after the final. At least this time it only went to a B+ rather than a B.
How is that class?
Differential Equations is treating me well this semester. It's the first math class I really enjoy. Is differential equations 2 along the same lines or completely different?
My friend (Bears/Chicago sports fan) and I are debating whether the Bears should go with Cutler or McCown next week after Urlacher said he'd start McCown.
I'd personally keep McCown in, that offensive machine's been rolling lately under his leadership. The friend says Cutler has more talent than McCown, and should be able to thrive immediately in that offense right where McCown left off.
So, I've got two questions for debate here:
1. If you were Trestman, would you dress McCown or Cutler next week?
And then a hypothetical:
2. With the weapons on the Bears offense (Marshall, Jeffery, Forte), do you think it would be possible for an awful QB like Blaine Gabbert (sorry, CI) to succeed on the Bears? Note: For this, I just mean succeed offensively, so don't factor in the Bears awful rush defense into the equation for "succeed".
Red Ring of Death