hockey. at times results are almost unexplainable using logic. we come out without much intensity, we make 4 turnovers early (bartley, jones, Forsberg, weber), we get heavily outshot, we have fewer scoring chances, we have one of our worst discipline games putting them on the pp time and again, always their real offensive strength. we're playing a highly desperate team in their home barn, that is emotional over parise's dad and his return, a team recently lamblasted by their coach and media. and make three plays pretty much all game but we bury all three and win easily. almost like it took little effort. yes, sometimes hockey is difficult to explain.
some thoughts:
..obviously, Wilson and rinne almost singlehandedly won us this game.
..jones stepped up to the 2nd pair and played a solid game
..bartley stepped onto the third pair and didn't play well at all.
..luckily or more like wisely, we limited bartley's to less than 10 minutes. hopefully he settles in better than today.
...jokinen has more points and goals in the last 10 games than Forsberg. a scary turn of events.
..we got nothing from our first line. again. forsberg and Ribeiro badly need neal back. we need neal back.
..the pk was outstanding. it had to be.
..rinne was outstanding. we need him to be
..everytime I see suter's shot from the blueline, I think of handtrick and I on a roadtrip to Chicago with the team where trotz turned to us and said he could stop suter's weak slapshot in his underwear with a pair of tweezers. lol.
I have to say, this win sort of worries me. afraid it might reinforce to some we don't have to give our best effort to win some games. because today we seemed to win without much effort. and just seemed to take it for granted we could turn it on in the third and win going away. which, gulp, we sort of did.