- Oct 3, 2013
- 37,093
- 10,744
Less than the number of undersized offensive defensemen that fizzled out pre-lockout era. The game is much kinder to undersized offensive defensemen in this eraHow many undersized offensive defenseman fizzle out?
Less than the number of undersized offensive defensemen that fizzled out pre-lockout era. The game is much kinder to undersized offensive defensemen in this eraHow many undersized offensive defenseman fizzle out?
In fairness, Lundkvist had a contract elsewhere and couldn't play his way into any spot.?????
So Villardi played his way up to the 2nd line on a NHL team but Lundkvist who has never seen any NHL action is the better prospect.
That makes total sense
Would prefer to get a future NHL player back if we’re parting with RobertsonI am likely too big on Kupari, and I like the fact Vilardi is already playing NHL games.
Madden for Robertson is the deal.
Kings always win stuff. Everytime it’s Anaheim and Kings in the draft lottery. Kings get jumped ahead. NHL draft lottery doesn’t like Anaheim for some reason.
That’s why Anaheim Ducks pays the big bucks for its scouts. We know Anaheim is always in the lower sections of the drafts
Every time? Excluding Byfield last year, the Kings have won the lottery once, in 1995, and selected Aki Berg. The f*** you mean every time lmao
Prospects so you can’t say where they end up for sure but if Byfield becomes that #1 C, Turcotte might be their 2nd line C, and the defender you trade that level prospect for needs to be better than what they have, and they have young 2nd pairing guys. The label you want to give them doesn’t change their value or either teams needs.So, just so I am reading this right.
You will only trade a top 6 centre for a #1 or #2 dman? Seems fair
As for Robertson, he is projected a top 4 dman. Schneider has a much higher ceiling and could become much more.
Sorry buddy,
We are not trading a 5'10 defender for a lightning fast 6'2 Center.
In general we learned here that nobody is trading away their top prospects due to unknown potential.
So what about we level out our pipeline in the lower ranks
Something around Roberts +3rd rounder for Lizotte
I'd consider something around Kupari and Lundkvist, I think having a Bjornfot and Lundkvist second pair would be awesome.
There would have to be a substantial add, because Lundkvist is closer to a Turcotte level prospect than a Kupari one.
Why's that? Kupari was leading the AHL in scoring before he was called up to the Kings as Ontario's number one center. Seems like they're both very good prospects to me.
Every Rangers thread on main board is usually Rangers fans shooting each other to be fair. At least the other team is participating in this one.Lovely. A thread of Kings fans and Rangers shooting down every trade proposal suggested by the other fanbase haha
an unproven late 1st rounder dies not get you a top 5 unless you are dealing with an idiot gm
an unproven late 1st rounder dies not get you a top 5 unless you are dealing with an idiot gm
Robertson is going to be an absolute shutdown monster of a top 4 D man. I think Schneider has the capability of being more offensive and a tad bit more abrasive but IMO they are pretty close value wise. Both play the physical game and have a very good first pass. Like it or not these two teams make great trading partners but it’s a little too early to estimate what the deal could beWould prefer to get a future NHL player back if we’re parting with Robertson
Have to agree here. If there was a redraft lundkvist goes top 10 easilyTurcotte is unproven also. At this point they're not draft picks. Lundkvist has been killing it in the SHL. Their draft position isn't the relevant anymore. It still is somewhat because they haven't done in the NHL, but you can't pretend that the last two years in the SHL didn't exist just because he was drafted late in the 1st round.
We’ll give you Kupari for everyone you mentioned. Hey man, we don’t need to make a dealRobertson is going to be an absolute shutdown monster of a top 4 D man. I think Schneider has the capability of being more offensive and a tad bit more abrasive but IMO they are pretty close value wise. Both play the physical game and have a very good first pass. Like it or not these two teams make great trading partners but it’s a little too early to estimate what the deal could be
NYR has
Lundkvist for sure top 4 D top pairing potential
Schneider for sure top 4 D could be an excellent 2-3
Robertson for sure top 4 D could be an excellent 2-3
Jones for sure top 4 D potential ??? Being compared to Fox sky could be the limit
Then they have established young D in Fox, lindgren, Miller, trouba for at least 3 more years
And they have some good bottom pairing options with guys like Renunen,Hajek, skinner etc.
it sucks that there’s not enough spots for all these great kids to play. So there will be an imminent trade for sure. LA is strong down the middle in their system. I don’t know if guys like Turcotte of Villardi predict to be better players then Chytil when all is said and done. Would love to add either. Then guys like madden,Thomas, etc it might be too early to tell what they top out as. I’d love more perspective from kings fans on what they think they have in their guys TbH. I excluded Byfield because it would be like the Rangers dealing LaF or Kakko. It would take a ridiculous established player to have them as apart of a trade, if either of those 3 would be traded at all
Nah, not moving Robertson for Lizotte. Robertson is an absolute sleeper in the Rangers system. I’d move Robertson+ for Kupari, but not for Lizotte. No thanks.
What about Madden+ or Thomas+
I will not part with Kupari
They probably are decent trading partners as they're 2 of the best prospect/young talent pools in the league and their strengths are the other pools weaknesses. But as a Rangers fan I'd want to see what we have in Kravtsov as a potential center candidate before making a major move for a center. Kravtsov has been our best player since joining the team and he's playing a hell of a lot like a center, he cheats toward the middle of the ice, and he's pretty much always the first man back, often even before one of the dmen.
Ummmmmm......
A) 7g 11a - 18 points since 19:52
B) 4g 7a - 11 points, 20:10 ice time
C) 1g 1a - 2 points (goal taken away) 11:57 ice time
Player A led the NHL in points sine Krav joined the team (9 games) Player C looked lost and slow in the game vrs the Islanders 4/9. Looked like he was trying to do too much with the puck with some turnovers. His second game he was moved to skate with better players. He looked better but easily wasn’t a top player on his team. The rangers then pounded the devils scoring 18 goals in the last 4 games. Player C had 1 point with a goal.
You are a ranger fan and hype up all your players any chance you can but this is a brutal statement. LA fans trust me player C hasn’t been anywhere near the best player on his team.