lo striver
Registered User
and how this will be affected by hiring the best GM that can build a wining and exciting team?
New GM Discussion Thread
- Thread starter Deebs
- Start date
- Status
Sterling Archer
Registered User
- Sep 26, 2006
- 22,979
- 13,449
Hahaha to creator of the thread. You must be incredibly naive or too young to know what’s going on.
There is about a 0.0001% chance the new GM isn’t French speaking. That’s not even a question, just a way of the Canadiens doing business. My money is on Serge Savard coming back.
There is about a 0.0001% chance the new GM isn’t French speaking. That’s not even a question, just a way of the Canadiens doing business. My money is on Serge Savard coming back.
Binary Code
How do I change that
Wtf ???
Je suis francophone de Montréal, au Québec et si le meilleur entraineur/GM disponible est anglophone ou russe ou peut importe je veux qu'il soit engagé. Tous les joueurs devraient être francophone aussi un coup partie hahahaha. Aujourdhui, pour le Canadiens, le français est signe de médiocrité.
OneSharpMarble
Registered User
Is this thread a serious question? Winning is not the top priority in Montreal and that is why they will be trapped in mediocrity.
Obviously french representation is important for the Montreal Canadiens. It's a fact of life. However, on its own it won't lead French speaking Quebecers to feel represented, in my mind. There is one reason why the Montreal Canadiens are a cultural icon for French speakers: it's because they were the best. You see it around the globe: people identify and take pride in what their countrymen and women are good at. Whatever it is that they excel at is mostly a historical accident. They don't care for also-rans. There's something powerful about seeing someone who's just like you do something great. There's nothing inspiring about watching someone just like you pilot your favourite team into the ground.
Did French speakers really feel alienated by Sam Pollock? I'm actually asking.
Did French speakers really feel alienated by Sam Pollock? I'm actually asking.
CHwest
Talent sets the floor, character sets the ceiling.
- May 24, 2011
- 3,517
- 4,611
Loser mentality, why would you limit your choice of the most important player on the team to less than 5% of the population. Hows that worked out in the new NHL?
By hiring a English speaking only General Manager its an insult to the people who from the beginning you represent . Montreal had English speaking General managers in the past but they were able to converse in French also . Some are saying hire a translator ? Have you ever watched Anti Chambre after the game and not understand what's being said with the host then translating what players are saying It is brutal .. The French speaking fans deserve better and deserve a General Manager who they can relate to and understand when he speaks.
OldCraig71
Registered User
Captain Mountain
Formerly Captain Wolverine
- Jun 6, 2010
- 20,441
- 14,018
1) The Canadiens serve more than just Francophones. They represent no one, since they're a business and fans are revenue sources.
2) Selke did not speak French;
3) Regardless of language, looking for a GM that the fans relate to is stupid. I want the GM to build a cup winner, not hang out with me at the bar.
I don't disagree that French language should be heavily considered when hiring a GM, but enough with this buddy-buddy view of a GM.
What ? I'll go look for a translator I don't understand you its not fair .. You just proved my point thanks
groovejuice
Without deviation progress is not possible
Pollock was born in Montreal and spoke fluent French.
Saint Patrick
2 rings in my hears
- Feb 14, 2007
- 4,806
- 685
That's the problem, there are too many things influencing simple decision. Yes the Canadiens are a religion here but they aren't a political party, they are a sports team in a league with experienced staff speaking English. The goal should be to build a winning team, that's it that's all.
We lack the courage to say, f*** it. Hire the best guy, have some people complain and then settle down when that team is dominating and bringing homes cups. We just need to have the courage to say win no matter what.
We lack the courage to say, f*** it. Hire the best guy, have some people complain and then settle down when that team is dominating and bringing homes cups. We just need to have the courage to say win no matter what.
I am of French Canadian ancestry. My father was the biggest Habs fan ever. He met le Gros Bil and I got the Rocket’s autograph at Parc Jarry when I was a kid. I don’t know if any French Canadian people who care about wether the GM or coach can speak French. Winners want to win! Seriously!
OldCraig71
Registered User
The Montreal Canadiens reside in a majority Francophone province . That being the case the General Manager needs to speak French.. This isn't 1950's 1960's 1970's those years of dominance are gone forever. Some how though a English speaking only General Manager would return the team to glory . Seriously
groovejuice
Without deviation progress is not possible
The problem is that absolutely no one said that. You wrote a complete fabrication. People are saying to hire the best. Not a single poster said that that person cannot or should not be a francophone.
Binary Code
How do I change that
Hollywood Burrows
Registered User
If the Habs turn away from their francophone heritage they'll be losing something that makes them unique in the NHL. If I were a fan of your team I'd think really hard before turning your back on that.
That being said, you have a French-speaking coach, French-speaking players. I don't think it should be an absolute prerequisite that the next GM speak French, but you'd probably want someone in a senior position in the front office who can do media in French.
That being said, you have a French-speaking coach, French-speaking players. I don't think it should be an absolute prerequisite that the next GM speak French, but you'd probably want someone in a senior position in the front office who can do media in French.
OldCraig71
Registered User
It has been used as a tool of detriment and as a means to create controversy all in the name of attracting viewership/listeners/readers and probably has something to do with making money off the local population. I believe that.
Moose Head
Registered User
Whitesnake
If you rebuild, they will come.
- Jan 5, 2003
- 89,423
- 36,744
And here we go again.....I understand what you are saying....the APPEARANCE that you can choose people no matter the language they speak appears to be the best solution ever. And yet...anglophones don't even do that. The league is filled with friends hiring friends. Why the heck isn't there more franco GM's in the league? Is it because they are all dumb? Is it because in Québec we don't know hockey and we are just so more stupid than everybody else? And for everybody who keeps talking about "doesn't matter if he's Russian, Japanese and so on..." can somebody tell me how many teams, especially the ones who are supposed to NOT have the language barrier than we do, have hired Japanese, Russians, Finnish or Swedish coaches? The problem here is that the REASON, the language, is worst than, friends hiring friends...but THE END RESULT is that it's completely false to say that the rest of the league chooses a huge pool of candidates while we don't.
If the fans, the media and whatever want a french coach and a french GM.....until there are some good candidates, so be it. But does it stop them from hiring anglo assistants? Bergevin hired Dudley....which I heard was one of the best ever.....and he assists Bergie in his decisions. You can totally think that we have a bad GM 'cause Bergie is french and he's an idiot...but what do you make of Dudley? Is he dumb too? If he totally disagree with a move, you don't think Bergie might listen? Would Bergie always go at the opposite of what Dudley wants? If so, why are they still together? There are still good franco candidates out there. And what does having a franco do? It buys time. You guys forgot about Cunneyworth? Franco coaches and GM's buy time. You can them surround them with whoever you want. It STILL can make a great management...Incredibly enough in here, everytime people say "take whoever is the best candidate" I can tell you that what they want is "do not take the franco". I will tell you that you would hire Julien Brisebois. You could get a Benoit Groulx. And I assure you that this could be just as good a duo as any freakin duo you can get. Then, Brisebois is young...Groulx is young, surround them with Robinson, bring a Cam Russell in so many other things you can do.....Everybody is happy.
If the fans, the media and whatever want a french coach and a french GM.....until there are some good candidates, so be it. But does it stop them from hiring anglo assistants? Bergevin hired Dudley....which I heard was one of the best ever.....and he assists Bergie in his decisions. You can totally think that we have a bad GM 'cause Bergie is french and he's an idiot...but what do you make of Dudley? Is he dumb too? If he totally disagree with a move, you don't think Bergie might listen? Would Bergie always go at the opposite of what Dudley wants? If so, why are they still together? There are still good franco candidates out there. And what does having a franco do? It buys time. You guys forgot about Cunneyworth? Franco coaches and GM's buy time. You can them surround them with whoever you want. It STILL can make a great management...Incredibly enough in here, everytime people say "take whoever is the best candidate" I can tell you that what they want is "do not take the franco". I will tell you that you would hire Julien Brisebois. You could get a Benoit Groulx. And I assure you that this could be just as good a duo as any freakin duo you can get. Then, Brisebois is young...Groulx is young, surround them with Robinson, bring a Cam Russell in so many other things you can do.....Everybody is happy.
OldCraig71
Registered User
- Status
