I believe it’s 47.How many contract's do the rangers currently have?
I believe it’s 47.How many contract's do the rangers currently have?
No more than 50% of a player's total cap hit can be retained. It doesn't matter how many teams are retaining on him.
Wow look at that. I guess I read the NHL rulebook wrong. Should take more time next time. Thanks.I believe this is wrong. Rob Scuderi was traded from PIT to CHI (33% retention) then from CHI to LAK (50% retention).
After review of cap friendly that is my understanding.Is that a thing. So you are saying the Rangers trade Nash to Edmonton at 50% and the Oilers then trade Nash to Boston at another 50% thus leaving the Bruins on the hook for only 25% of Nash’s original remaining salary. Am I getting this correct?
Looks like I couldn't have been more wrong on this. Not sure what my Bruins are thinking, but that's why I'm not a GM.
Wow look at that. I guess I read the NHL rulebook wrong. Should take more time next time. Thanks.
Haha. You made me doubt it too. I had to double check.Wow look at that. I guess I read the NHL rulebook wrong. Should take more time next time. Thanks.
Well if this is all true and New York trades Nash at 50% to Edmonton then from there to Vancouver and there to Vegas(why not McPhee is a good sport an an ex Ranger) all at 50% then he ends up in Boston at 6.125% of his original remaining salary.
Only in the NHL.[/QUOT
Contract can only be retained twice. So that can’t work.Well if this is all true and New York trades Nash at 50% to Edmonton then from there to Vancouver and there to Vegas(why not McPhee is a good sport an an ex Ranger) all at 50% then he ends up in Boston at 6.125% of his original remaining salary.
Only in the NHL.
So Nash retained at 50% wouldn't be enough to get him under Boston's cap?Contract can only be retained twice. So that can’t work.
Okay, this one is word for word from the rulebookWell if this is all true and New York trades Nash at 50% to Edmonton then from there to Vancouver and there to Vegas(why not McPhee is a good sport an an ex Ranger) all at 50% then he ends up in Boston at 6.125% of his original remaining salary.
Only in the NHL.
So Nash retained at 50% wouldn't be enough to get him under Boston's cap?
A lot more than probablyIf Beleskey was in the deal it's solid I believe. But adding him in probably sweetens the pot for the Rangers.
Maybe BOS can get a team to take that contract on and they can split the cost to polish the deal.If Beleskey was in the deal it's solid I believe. But adding him in probably sweetens the pot for the Rangers.
It costs a lot a more than that to take a 3.8 for 3 years contract of a worthless playerMaybe BOS can get a team to take that contract on and they can split the cost to polish the deal.
Bos toss 2 x 4th (2018 & 2019) to a team to take beleskey and NYR pays them back with their own 2018 or 2019)
Rangers can retain. Our owner isn't cheap like MelynkSo Nash retained at 50% wouldn't be enough to get him under Boston's cap?
Rangers can retain. Our owner isn't cheap like Melynk
Some of us like to live dangerouslyContract can only be retained twice. So that can’t work.