I mean you moved him but are spending $400k more for a worse player. Congrats?
Helps the tank though even more I guess.
At least, It feeds relationships between GM. Montreal helps Dallas on that one, maybe will helps the tank later
I mean you moved him but are spending $400k more for a worse player. Congrats?
Helps the tank though even more I guess.
It's a good gamble for the Habs.
I'd rather see what Gurianov can do than get a 4th round pick.
He is an RFA with a $3M QO.. I'd rather a pick.
Montreal using a retention on Dadonov means they won't be much active at the deadline.
This is his 5th team in 4 yearsDallas just traded for him, actually. Let me see if I can find the post about it.
Lots has happened then this season
Last time i checked, Gurianov was good!
- playing well and producing
I admit i havent followed him at all this season
19-20 : 26 goal, 11 assist, 37 point pace
20-21 : 18 goal, 27 assist, 45 point pace
21-22 : 11 goals, 31 points, in 70 games
Kinda hasty to trade a player who has struggled for half a season...
Dadonov : 185 points for the Panthers in 3 seasons, scored 20 goals, 43 points, in 76 games last season for Vegas.
Kinda strange that they both would have all of the sudden started to suck
What kind of pick would Montreal have got? A 5th? Maybe? The odds that 5th round pick, or worse, amounts to anything are slim. Gurianov may not work. He may not sign another NHL contract. He aligns with part of Hugo's philosophy of obtaining prospects or young players that they believe they can work with. IMO, this is less of a gamble than a mid to late pick.He is an RFA with a $3M QO.. I'd rather a pick.
Why's that?Montreal using a retention on Dadonov means they won't be much active at the deadline.
What kind of pick would Montreal have got? A 5th? Maybe? The odds that 5th round pick, or worse, amounts to anything are slim. Gurianov may not work. He may not sign another NHL contract. He aligns with part of Hugo's philosophy of obtaining prospects or young players that they believe they can work with. IMO, this is less of a gamble than a mid to late pick.
Can he be a decent 3rd liner?He is an RFA with a $3M QO.. I'd rather a pick.
We don't have to qualify him and can resign him at a cheaper contract if needed.You have 20 games to "work" with Gurianov, then you need to sign him to a $3M deal.. you are renting a player while not in a playoff position I'd rather a 5th and have a 0.005% chance of an NHL player than a guy who is gone in 60 days but you do you.
(Assuming a pick is even on the table, which it probably isn't TBH)
I thought dadonov would have 0 value. Is gurianov a bust or what?
Montreal certainly didn’t lose this deal but oh boy are there some strange overreactions about a player who has gotten so bad that he is on pace for 3.5 goals and plays 9 minutes a night.
Gurianov won’t hurt your tank at all Habs fans. No worries there.
Can he be a decent 3rd liner?
Can he be a decent 3rd liner?