Stan
Registered User
- Mar 20, 2005
- 1,094
- 1
I guess we'll agree to disagree but Beaulieu's window to be a top 4 is not closed yet as far as I'm concerned and given the poor shape of our D, I would have preferred to keep the more talented player who also happens to be much younger.
I don't understand the move. Even if they were going to lose Beaulieu....it would have indirectly protected Hudon. Is Hudon worth a 3rd?