SensontheRush
Never said it was Sunshine
I was initially going to come in here and "meh" over the perceived discrepancy between the two, but it's possible that Gaudreau's smaller body will assist him in aging gracefully.
Bennett is absolutely an upgrade on Monahan.Are people really going with Bennett is an upgrade on what Monahan was now?
Hard no from me
Bennett is absolutely an upgrade on Monahan.
He was always an upgrade on Monahan. Monahan was healthy at the start of the year, skating better than he had in years. But without Gaudreau he was exposed. It's been that way his entire career - he never produced above a 3rd line level without Gaudreau on his line.Well now of course.
When healthy no. I could see that 2nd line struggling to produce
He was always an upgrade on Monahan. Monahan was healthy at the start of the year, skating better than he had in years. But without Gaudreau he was exposed. It's been that way his entire career - he never produced above a 3rd line level without Gaudreau on his line.
His skating was better than it had been in years.Monahan wasn't even close to healthy. He couldn't skate or shoot. Three years ago be would have had twenty goals on the third line.
Huberdeau produced 92 points in 18/19 with less than 50% Ozs. Gaudreau also got pumped with Ozs btw.Considering Huberdeau has 72%Ozs with only half a minute less ice time per game and about as many PK mins as Barkov despite playing 13 games more. It’s quite clear that it created more opportunities to Huberdeau than took them away.
Yup. Johnny will be over 800 points and Huberdeau will be closer to 600.Gaudreau over 8 years easily
Calgary will not be a power house on offense and Hub is already 30
If everything pawn out Columbus will have a hell of a transition game, Werenski Jiricek Boqvist Mateychuk with Laine and they young player
61%>50%, Huberdeau has never had less than 50%Ozs.Huberdeau produced 92 points in 18/19 with less than 50% Ozs. Gaudreau also got pumped with Ozs btw.
61%>50%, Huberdeau has never had less than 50%Ozs.
The point was that having Barkov’s line take the hardest matchups allowed Huberdeau to get the easier matchups, while Gaudreau’s line has been the only line in Flames that opponents had to focus on.
Season | Age | Team | Lg | GP | TOI | CF | CA | CF% | CF% rel | FF | FA | FF% | FF% rel | oiGF | oiSH% | oiGA | oiSV% | PDO | oZS% | dZS% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Corsi (EV) | Fenwick (EV) | PDO (EV) | Zone Starts (EV) | |||||||||||||||||
2012-13 | 19 | FLA | NHL | 48 | 697.6 | 691 | 653 | 51.4 | 2.8 | 527 | 497 | 51.5 | 4.2 | 25 | 6.4 | 42 | 88.6 | 94.9 | 63.9 | 36.1 |
2013-14 | 20 | FLA | NHL | 69 | 928.4 | 888 | 839 | 51.4 | 1.0 | 660 | 650 | 50.4 | -0.9 | 39 | 7.9 | 43 | 91.2 | 99.0 | 53.9 | 46.1 |
2014-15 | 21 | FLA | NHL | 79 | 1124.8 | 1064 | 946 | 52.9 | 2.2 | 793 | 718 | 52.5 | 1.9 | 54 | 9.2 | 40 | 92.5 | 101.7 | 51.1 | 48.9 |
2015-16 | 22 | FLA | NHL | 76 | 1132.6 | 963 | 1023 | 48.5 | -0.3 | 779 | 794 | 49.5 | 0.6 | 66 | 11.2 | 45 | 92.0 | 103.2 | 43.2 | 56.8 |
2016-17 | 23 | FLA | NHL | 31 | 473.8 | 482 | 391 | 55.2 | 7.4 | 381 | 321 | 54.3 | 6.7 | 25 | 8.6 | 25 | 89.7 | 98.3 | 61.1 | 38.9 |
2017-18 | 24 | FLA | NHL | 82 | 1276.2 | 1365 | 1263 | 51.9 | 3.9 | 1050 | 958 | 52.3 | 3.3 | 72 | 9.2 | 71 | 89.9 | 99.1 | 46.5 | 53.5 |
2018-19 | 25 | FLA | NHL | 82 | 1252.4 | 1280 | 1183 | 52.0 | 3.7 | 994 | 917 | 52.0 | 3.1 | 72 | 9.6 | 77 | 88.4 | 98.0 | 49.2 | 50.8 |
2019-20 | 26 | FLA | NHL | 69 | 1033.2 | 1008 | 946 | 51.6 | 2.7 | 781 | 740 | 51.3 | 2.0 | 72 | 12.1 | 64 | 88.6 | 100.7 | 58.2 | 41.8 |
2020-21 | 27 | FLA | NHL | 55 | 772.9 | 712 | 596 | 54.4 | 1.2 | 572 | 464 | 55.2 | 2.0 | 52 | 11.8 | 36 | 90.0 | 101.9 | 64.8 | 35.2 |
2021-22 | 28 | FLA | NHL | 80 | 1111.2 | 1199 | 894 | 57.3 | 0.7 | 910 | 704 | 56.4 | -0.2 | 91 | 12.8 | 59 | 89.0 | 101.8 | 70.2 | 29.8 |
Career | NHL | 671 | 9803.1 | 9652 | 8734 | 52.5 | 2.0 | 7447 | 6763 | 52.4 | 1.7 | 568 | 10.1 | 502 | 90.0 | 100.1 | 54.9 | 45.1 |
Corsi (EV) | Fenwick (EV) | PDO (EV) | Zone Starts (EV) | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Season | Age | Team | Lg | GP | TOI | CF | CA | CF% | CF% rel | FF | FA | FF% | FF% rel | oiGF | oiSH% | oiGA | oiSV% | PDO | oZS% | dZS% |
2013-14 | 20 | CGY | NHL | 1 | 13.7 | 11 | 8 | 57.9 | 7 | 5 | 58.3 | 1 | 25.0 | 0 | 100.0 | 125.0 | 28.6 | 71.4 | ||
2014-15 | 21 | CGY | NHL | 80 | 1178.7 | 1095 | 1220 | 47.3 | 3.7 | 783 | 847 | 48.0 | 2.9 | 67 | 12.2 | 54 | 90.8 | 102.9 | 56.0 | 44.0 |
2015-16 | 22 | CGY | NHL | 79 | 1280.0 | 1221 | 1195 | 50.5 | 3.1 | 884 | 875 | 50.3 | 2.2 | 71 | 10.8 | 65 | 89.4 | 100.2 | 56.7 | 43.3 |
2016-17 | 23 | CGY | NHL | 72 | 1092.2 | 1048 | 977 | 51.8 | 1.7 | 773 | 733 | 51.3 | 1.5 | 49 | 8.6 | 52 | 90.2 | 98.7 | 63.3 | 36.7 |
2017-18 | 24 | CGY | NHL | 80 | 1268.8 | 1424 | 1190 | 54.5 | 1.9 | 1059 | 933 | 53.2 | 0.4 | 75 | 10.2 | 66 | 89.8 | 100.0 | 59.3 | 40.7 |
2018-19 | 25 | CGY | NHL | 82 | 1370.0 | 1443 | 1184 | 54.9 | 1.7 | 1068 | 920 | 53.7 | 0.9 | 88 | 11.5 | 67 | 89.6 | 101.1 | 57.8 | 42.2 |
2019-20 | 26 | CGY | NHL | 70 | 1089.8 | 1103 | 1031 | 51.7 | 1.8 | 812 | 807 | 50.2 | 0.7 | 50 | 8.5 | 56 | 90.5 | 99.0 | 58.7 | 41.3 |
2020-21 | 27 | CGY | NHL | 56 | 830.9 | 755 | 672 | 52.9 | 0.0 | 579 | 517 | 52.8 | 0.4 | 40 | 9.7 | 37 | 90.2 | 99.9 | 60.0 | 40.0 |
2021-22 | 28 | CGY | NHL | 82 | 1276.2 | 1401 | 1050 | 57.2 | 2.5 | 1078 | 820 | 56.8 | 2.6 | 118 | 15.3 | 52 | 91.3 | 106.5 | 53.9 | 46.1 |
Career | NHL | 602 | 9400.3 | 9501 | 8527 | 52.7 | 2.2 | 7043 | 6457 | 52.2 | 1.5 | 559 | 11.0 | 449 | 90.2 | 101.3 | 58.0 | 42.0 |
Jonathan Huberdeau Stats, Height, Weight, Position, Salary, Title | Hockey-Reference.com
Checkout the latest stats of Jonathan Huberdeau. Get info about his position, age, height, weight, trade, draft, salary and more on Hockey-Reference.comwww.hockey-reference.com
Season Age Team Lg GP TOI CF CA CF% CF% rel FF FA FF% FF% rel oiGF oiSH% oiGA oiSV% PDO oZS% dZS% Corsi (EV) Fenwick (EV) PDO (EV) Zone Starts (EV) 2012-13 19 FLA NHL 48 697.6 691 653 51.4 2.8 527 497 51.5 4.2 25 6.4 42 88.6 94.9 63.9 36.1 2013-14 20 FLA NHL 69 928.4 888 839 51.4 1.0 660 650 50.4 -0.9 39 7.9 43 91.2 99.0 53.9 46.1 2014-15 21 FLA NHL 79 1124.8 1064 946 52.9 2.2 793 718 52.5 1.9 54 9.2 40 92.5 101.7 51.1 48.9 2015-16 22 FLA NHL 76 1132.6 963 1023 48.5 -0.3 779 794 49.5 0.6 66 11.2 45 92.0 103.2 43.2 56.8 2016-17 23 FLA NHL 31 473.8 482 391 55.2 7.4 381 321 54.3 6.7 25 8.6 25 89.7 98.3 61.1 38.9 2017-18 24 FLA NHL 82 1276.2 1365 1263 51.9 3.9 1050 958 52.3 3.3 72 9.2 71 89.9 99.1 46.5 53.5 2018-19 25 FLA NHL 82 1252.4 1280 1183 52.0 3.7 994 917 52.0 3.1 72 9.6 77 88.4 98.0 49.2 50.8 2019-20 26 FLA NHL 69 1033.2 1008 946 51.6 2.7 781 740 51.3 2.0 72 12.1 64 88.6 100.7 58.2 41.8 2020-21 27 FLA NHL 55 772.9 712 596 54.4 1.2 572 464 55.2 2.0 52 11.8 36 90.0 101.9 64.8 35.2 2021-22 28 FLA NHL 80 1111.2 1199 894 57.3 0.7 910 704 56.4 -0.2 91 12.8 59 89.0 101.8 70.2 29.8 Career NHL 671 9803.1 9652 8734 52.5 2.0 7447 6763 52.4 1.7 568 10.1 502 90.0 100.1 54.9 45.1
I doubt it. He'll still have the best IQ and anticipation in the league when he loses a step.It entirely depends on if Johnny can maintain his speed and quickness into his 30s. Whenever that goes it will be a quick downfall for him.
Are people not aware that Huberdeau is 2 months older than Gaudreau?
Anyway, I will say Gaudreau here..but it's going to be closer than people think.
Monahan only ever played one full season before this last one without Gaudreau and had 22 goals. That's top 6 production.The numbers don't lie - Monahan has never produced better than a bottom 6 player without Gaudreau while being very poor all over the ice.
and 34 points despite shooting at 16%. That's not top 6 production.Monahan only ever played one full season before this last one without Gaudreau and had 22 goals. That's top 6 production.