Marner is probably not 3.5m (50%) better than Nylander in the future. Not because Marner is bad, but because Nylander is still a very good hockey player. (Don't @ me)
Matthews is well over 1 million better than Marner.
I'd put Marner square in the middle between the two in an ideal world. 9.5m x 5, 10.5 would need at least 7 years term.
fair enough, and i'm not arguing or disagreeing but i would like to ask - where you say Matthews is 'well' over a million better, why?