NYR469 said:
no that means keep negotiating...if a number of players are unhappy with the deal (and i'm just making up a hypothetical situation), guerin, linden and co aren't going to go back to the league and say "oh well looks like we aren't playing this year". they are going to go back to the league and say "look the players aren't going to go for the deal as it stands. you are gonna have to give me something. if you give us A & B, i think i can sell the guys on C & D" etc
First I want to go on record that I don't think this is the case ..
However when I read your "look the players aren't going to go for the deal as it stands. you are gonna have to give me something. if you give us A & B, i think i can sell the guys on C & D" etc"
I thought what if you are right .. but just take it one step further just to play devils advocate ..
What if this is a PA set-up .. Meaning that its staged .. and the purpose is exactly as you suggest Bob is out of the way for now .. You give us A & B and we will try to sell it .. That tactic might get the NHLPA their best possible deal they ever will by having the owners toss them a few more bones before they sign-off ..
Again just for thought and discusion .. because I am trying to figure out what Linden, Gartner, or Guerin has to go to Bob McKenzie and leak info designed to split the union. In normal Union negotiations that weakens your position.
If you are elected by the players as the president of the NHLPA comittee and you are their voice . Then are you really acting in the PA best interests to tell people of a cracks coming to divide the very group you represent. Or will you be labeled a traitor by your own group ??.
A good captain keeps his team together not divides it and a good Captain at sea does down with the ship ..