Because neither of our "30 goal scorers" scored even a single goal. I get why it's fun to spin our #1 defenseman outscoring our two most prolific scoring forwards combined the other way though...
Yeah and a more productive, more mobile, more offensively skilled #1 d-man would've made
more plays and opened up
better lanes for these guys to shoot from good angles and squeeze pucks in.
I know this because I know how Subban plays and how Weber plays and I know that Subban is more productive than Weber.
How else do you want to try to spin this yarn?
We lost in the most predictable way: lack of goals. I thought Weber was suppose to help with that?
We lost because we didn't have enough character to come back from ONE goal down. I thought Weber was supposed to help with that?
He did a fine job, exceeded my standards, but he didn't make the players around him better. Subban does.
And the topic of the thread is Pacioretty - someone who could've used the help Subban brings on the regular.