Donnybrook
Registered User
Which of these two young D-men has the most potetial, and which one would you want on your team. My choice would be Matt Carle but only because i've seen him more than Jack Johnson.
Donnybrook said:Which of these two young D-men has the most potetial, and which one would you want on your team. My choice would be Matt Carle but only because i've seen him more than Jack Johnson.
Chrisd said:if you aren't selected in the 1st round, you can't be a good prospect to many on this board...
matt carle is freaking great, was a better college player then ryan suter i can tell u that much. I'm not even a Denver fan at all, but give respect where it's due. Matt Carle is amazing.
Wild GM said:Carle was as good as a Freshman and better in International play at the same age.
too true.Chrisd said:if you aren't selected in the 1st round, you can't be a good prospect to many on this board...
reidy said:Johnson had 32 points as a freshman playing on a less gifted team than Carle did.
Johnson by far.Donnybrook said:Which of these two young D-men has the most potetial, and which one would you want on your team. My choice would be Matt Carle but only because i've seen him more than Jack Johnson.
Carle's package > Johnson's packagePete Rock said:I think that it lies in the middle here: it's not as far apart as some posters are stating, but anyone who says it's real close has to either be a Sharks fan, a Pioneers fan, or a Johnson hater.
The Sharks have made wonderful selections that were off the board, but Carle simply doesn't have the same package that Johnson has.
EDIT - Okay kids, you all know what I meant by "package" so lets keep our minds out of the gutter.
My package > Your packagespacelobster said:Carle's package > Johnson's package
superroyain10 said:Carle does not get enough attention 'cause he is a Sharks prospect and no one really cares, IMO
Cardiac_Canes said:And how many people really care about Canes prospects?