all i saw was alot of pitt fans saying how bad he was and to yank him for murray because he sucked. were they wrong?
Let's not play revisionist history here. Keeping Murray and exposing MAF was the correct and obvious thing to do. We should end that thread of discussion before it starts.
MAF was a lot of things in Pittsburgh. You can almost break it down by eras, really.
The Edzo era: Uber-athletic #1 overall pick that was thrown to the wolves in front of a ludicrously awful team, no goaltending coach and general Country Club-attitude around the team
The Therrien era: Team is better, still no goalie coach, relying on his athleticism above all else and some fair questions about his mental toughness/dedication to the game emerge; is spectacular in the 2008 playoffs
The Bylsma era: Athleticism is at its peak, Mike Bales is hired as goalie coach; regular seasons stabilize into a very-good-to-elite groove (2010-2016: 2.35/.919), playoffs are a disaster as Bylsma refuses/is unable to get the team to play any defense and MAF's meltdowns combine into a vicious cycle
The Johnston era: Years of working with Bales transform MAF into a fairly solid positional goalie; playoffs are good but small sample size, rest of Penguins hate Johnston and run him out of town
The Sullivan era: Run of very solid regular seasons continue until Murray comes along, throwing confidence into a tailspin; is a non-factor in the 2016 cup run but is absolutely critical and clutch in 2017 as the Pens absolutely do not win without him
So: stable regular-season goaltender that relied too much on athleticism early in his career but became more sound when the Pens actually hired a goalie coach, despite the best efforts of Bylsma to f*** everything up. Playoffs vacillated from excellent (2008, 2014, 2017) to god-awful (2010-2013). How Pens fans ultimately feel about him depends on whether you cast more blame on Bylsma or on MAF for the playoff failures between 2009-2015.
He is a beloved member of the team and the community throughout.
The difference in him now and the Bylsma era of only five years ago is incredibly stark. He's just as athletic as he ever was, but his positioning and rebound control are vastly different. Combine that with a good defensive team and lots of confidence, and you're seeing the results. He's peaking later than most due to the Edzo/Therrien eras, but I think you're probably looking at 3-4 more years of 2.30/.920, ending up 3rd in all-time wins.