jfc64
Registered User
- Jul 2, 2006
- 4,393
- 370
My sisters kids have the internet skills to insert a picture of a yacht here.
I have no idea about this kind of thing, but did they front load it? Would make sense due to they fact that we are going to have to sign some players down the road and hopefully the cap goes up I the futures.
I have no idea about this kind of thing, but did they front load it? Would make sense due to they fact that we are going to have to sign some players down the road and hopefully the cap goes up in the future.
Thanks, I’m definitely not the guy to go to regarding contracts.Actual cash, yeah, but it's a 12.6m cap hit and AAV every year.
23-24: $775k Base + $15.725m Signing Bonus
24-25: $775k + $15.725m
25-26: $800k + $15.25m
26-27: $9.15m + $3.0m
27-28: $990k + $8.91m
28-29: $990k + $8.91m
29-30: $990k + $8.91m
30-31: $990k + $8.91m
For example, over 16m in each of the first two years and under 10m in each of the las 4 years.
CBA... lowers the potential bill for the Kroenkes in case there is a lockout.The weird year is 2026-27, the signing bonus drop down to around $3 million and the actual salary jump way up to $9 million, but then the remaining four years the bonuses average around 8.9 million and salary drops back way down to six figures.
Ain't no buyout happenin' here, that's for sure.
CBA... lowers the potential bill for the Kroenkes in case there is a lockout.
Aaaaahhhh okay that makes sense. They won't owe him a ton of money that season, that's actually kinda smart, though I hope to hell there isn't another goddamned work stoppage.
For budgeting purposes, the CBA calls for the Average Annual Value to be attributed to the cap ceiling each year. As such, front loading does nothing in terms of cap. Kroenke just won a Superbowl and a Stanley Cup (and purchased the entire Six Flags next to Ball arena, to turn it into mixed-use income generation, not an amusement park.) So he has the money to pay.I have no idea about this kind of thing, but did they front load it? Would make sense due to they fact that we are going to have to sign some players down the road and hopefully the cap goes up in the future.
Most players would be, but Nate's gonna be spending 80-85M of that on his physical and nutritional training over the next 8 years.I was fine with anything less than a number starting with 13, so this is alright.
Congrats MacK. Just a hair over 100 million dollars. Set for life.
Nate's situation has always been different because he's had to hear about how his contract was the the best deal in the league throughout most of it. People's perception is skewed because he said he'd take less again, but let's be honest here. He's owed some back pay. And at the end of the day, he did take less again considering what he would've gotten on the open market.Happy for Nate but I'm shocked by this contract. I really didn't think it was going to come in north of McDavid's deal.
Tampa has largely been able to keep their team together because guys like Kucherov and Stamkos took a fair bit less when they could have gotten more. I think Rantanen and Landeskog and Makar all kind of followed this to varying degrees, and then MacKinnon comes in demanding to be the highest paid player in NHL...
When Barkov signed for 10m, I thought Nate would come in a little higher but in the same area roughly. 12.6 is not that.
If the cap goes up a ton in the near/immediate future maybe this won't be so bad, but for the moment it looks like a great contract for the player and a killer to the depth of the team.
If I recall correctly, the Nichushkin contract also had a lot of bonuses, the first cracks in the "no signing bonuses" armor.Wow $85M in signing bonuses. Avs finally break the bank on that front.
Very fair deal all around.