Why does it mean Miletic isn't coming back? They only have 2 OAs now
I predict he's here within the next 5 days
Saving the last spot for an o/a dman
Besides Bouchard who btw is the only dman who has any points so far this season,will get the puck to the forwards,let alone worry about defending when u have 4 rookie dmen playing every night.
If you look at the box scores of the last few games miletic has played in he has no points only 2 shots on net and 2 penalty minutes my guess is he will be back in a week or twoI think it's more likely that Rollo was available for cheap, and Simpson jumped on the opportunity.
According to a Pens fan on their forum, this is what WBS forward depth chart probably looks like:
"ZAR-Smith-Sprong
Simon-Johnson-Thomas
Wilson-Blueger-TK
DiPauli-Burton-Dea
Scratched: Tiffels/Sestito/Josephs/Haggerty/Quinney/McGrath/Miletic(who may end up back in London)"
I kind of figured it would be something like that - Pittsburgh has a very deep farm system. If he and I are right and Miletic doesn't crack the AHL squad, it's between the ECHL or OHL.
Not really sure what to make of this trade...but can't see it making an impact IMO. Is Tyler Rollo really supposed to be the answer to our problems? Is he supposed to be added muscle?...because it doesn't seem as though his career is full of scoring.
http://www.eliteprospects.com/player.php?player=239656
What's the word of Brady Tkachuck...or even Boqvist? WHO DO WE REALLY have a possibility of having come back? Mete..gone, Juolevi...buh bye, Crawley...nice know'n ya, Miletic...adios!
Is this Rollo kid the start to a firesale?
I like this ideaI know most fans hate the forward converted to d-man notion...but if/when Mete returns I wouldn't be opposed to trying Carbonara back there as his partner.
Why does it mean Miletic isn't coming back? They only have 2 OAs now
I predict he's here within the next 5 days
What the lines are going to be, here is my guess;
F
Jones-Thomas-Miletic
Rollo-Pu-Carbonara
Whittaker-Foudy-Tymkin
-Muskal-Nelson-Rowe
(Duhart,Turko,McKinnon = and to jr B - Pierce,Cottam)
D
Golden-Bouchard
Regula-Coome
Perrott-Bangs
(Fallowfield)
G
Kooy
Johnson
?
-That's my couch Coaching lineup, does anyone else sees something different ?
Good call. Definitely wont hurt. If healthy Id expect 35-40Gs based on last year.
Miletic will certainly help out with the offence--glad he's been returned.
I remember from last season that Rollo played well against the Knights, especially in a PK role--his name stuck in my head. Ideally, you wouldn't have him on the second line, but he'll be an asset.
The main concern is on defence, and HL11 is absolutely right--who other than Bouchard can be counted on to move the puck up ice?
For me, the writing is on the wall, yes even after 5 or 7 games. We lack the depth to compete this season, and I think it's just a matter of time before we start to sell some key pieces. If you disagree, and you think that we are in the mix this season to compete, then present a scenario in which our defence would be deep enough to compete for a championship (then we can talk about our forwards, and goaltenders).
Even if Mete returns, consider our D:
Mete, Bouchard, Golden, Coome, Fallowfield, Perrott, Regula, and Bangs--that's not even close to being a solid defence core. 5 rookie d-men!
Crawley is gone.
By my estimate we would need to acquire at least two top-4 d-men, and we would also need both Bratt and Formenton to return if we hope to salvage this season. Then there's the question of goaltending...
I just cannot foresee how we could be a legitimate contender this year. Not complaining, just stating an opinion. There's nothing wrong with re-tooling.
Miletic will certainly help out with the offence--glad he's been returned.
I remember from last season that Rollo played well against the Knights, especially in a PK role--his name stuck in my head. Ideally, you wouldn't have him on the second line, but he'll be an asset.
The main concern is on defence, and HL11 is absolutely right--who other than Bouchard can be counted on to move the puck up ice?
For me, the writing is on the wall, yes even after 5 or 7 games. We lack the depth to compete this season, and I think it's just a matter of time before we start to sell some key pieces. If you disagree, and you think that we are in the mix this season to compete, then present a scenario in which our defence would be deep enough to compete for a championship (then we can talk about our forwards, and goaltenders).
Even if Mete returns, consider our D:
Mete, Bouchard, Golden, Coome, Fallowfield, Perrott, Regula, and Bangs--that's not even close to being a solid defence core. 5 rookie d-men!
Crawley is gone.
By my estimate we would need to acquire at least two top-4 d-men, and we would also need both Bratt and Formenton to return if we hope to salvage this season. Then there's the question of goaltending...
I just cannot foresee how we could be a legitimate contender this year. Not complaining, just stating an opinion. There's nothing wrong with re-tooling.
Great news.
And then there were 3...
Formenton is 90% going to be back - it's just a matter of when. I don't think he'll actually get 9 games, though.
I'll pay close attention to Mete tonight.
Get both him and Bratt back and we might still be looking at a contender.
I agree about Formenton, he played well enough at camp to earn him a few days with the big club to get the feel of it, he may not even participate in any games, he will be back in London for sure. Brett is a much different story, he not only played well he excelled with the big club, he is in the position where he can help at the NHL level if not at the AHL for sure. Bratt is as good as gone and so is Mete. Mete's popularity has taken a life of it's own with most Montreal fans, they'll want Bergervin's backside if he send Mete back to London !