Redder Winger
Registered User
- May 4, 2017
- 3,700
- 730
Explain? What’s wrong with that ambition?By the way...
the new Red Wings standard is:
"We want to play meaningful games in March."
What the ****?
Well seeing as how we are not playing meaningful games in Dec is a start lol.Explain? What’s wrong with that ambition?
What parts sound desperate or flailing?
I hear a standard interview where Holland talks about the realities of building through the draft. What bothers you so much?
It sounds like a verbatim assessment from the December 5th interview except for the 3 minutes he talks about Babcock repeating the same things 5 times.
That's what stuck out to me though, it's not even about making the playoffs, his goal posts moved to competing for a spot in March is good enough.
Explain? What’s wrong with that ambition?
What parts sound desperate or flailing?
I hear a standard interview where Holland talks about the realities of building through the draft. What bothers you so much?
"It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it."
I hear a standard interview where Holland talks about the realities of building through the draft. What bothers you so much?
Good interview. He said we are rebuilding without directly saying we are rebuilding.
"My hope was that comes March we would be in the hunt for a playoff spot"
Agree! And everyone thinks Ken is done after this year... I doubt it!Here's the bullet points of the interview:
(***) in brackets is my take-
- Wants the team to play competitive hockey (*of course!)
- Wants to play games in March that are meaningful (*Don't want the players to learn bad habits)
- Elite teams happen through the draft (*Agreed! Not sure why people worry about the salary cap and contracts right now?)
- It Happens slowly - continue to move younger players into the team (*Just as he's been doing all along, filter young players in)
- Young players need to get adjusted to the game/league and experience (*Goes without saying. Look no further than Oilers and Sabres to see how it ruins a hockey club)
- You don't turn over a roster in 12 months (*Over the course of the next 4 years, 16 UFA contracts come off the books - He's going to keep injecting young players in)
- You turn over a roster in 3 to 4 seasons (*See above - 16 contracts coming off the books - You don't firesale, it ruins the young kids)
Good interview. He said we are rebuilding without directly saying we are rebuilding.
- Looking around the league at other teams, elite teams don't become elite in a year or two, it is a slow process (*Yes. It is proven to take 8+ years if everything goes right. 10 to 15 if you don't get a little luck)
By the way...
the new Red Wings standard is:
"We want to play meaningful games in March."
What the ****?
Good pick up, that's kind of sad. The end of last season he made mention of building to compete for a SC but haven't that reiterated in a while. Contrary to the opinions of a few people I think the statements made to the fans are somewhat important.
I'm more curious about the lack of desperation from Holland. He's saying nothing new than a year ago. Build through the draft, integrate young players. I disagree that the roster can't be overturned in 12-18 months. Holland said 3-4 years but that's by sitting on your hands 364 days after the draft. What he means is moves can't be made without looking like an idiot.
In the spring of 2014 Shanahan was brought in as President of the TML to evaluate and oversee all operations of their team. Within a year he fired two coaches, GM Nonis, an assitant GM, the VP, head of pro scouting (including 18 scouts), and head of player development. By February 2016 they had trader their top scorer Kessel and finally Dion Phaneuf. Now that's scorched earth!
My question, is there anyone respected enough to take over Chris Illich's position as President? Others have said the Wings desperately need an outsider to take the reigns. A new plan to push the rebuild towards being a contender into gear. Someone who can clearly evaluate the vision of Holland and Martin. Get a fresh perspective on the job Howe, Wright, Fischer, and Horcoff are doing. Fisher was a great player but is he the best individual available as Director of Player Evaluation?
It's obvious we have some significant deficiencies within hockey operations. IMO Ken Holland moving upstairs to a senior advisory role is not the answer to returning the Wings to greatness.
Bull**** police to the rescue.
Here's the actual quote:
Interviewer: I'm curious to know what were the conversations like at the beginning of the year? What were you guys saying about this team ... expectations for this team and then how would you explain where you're at now?
Holland: Before this season my hope was that in the months of March that we would be, for lack of better words, I guess relevant in the playoff race and that we ... last year obviously we unloaded at the TDL. We were far enough back that (we/I) made a decision to unload. The hope was that we would be in the hunt ... as we speak today we're obviously 4 pts out of the third place in our division and I think we're 7 pts out of the second wild card, so we were sort of in the hunt until this stretch where we won one game in our last 11.
I highlighted the part you misquoted. I know others may not be willing/have the time to do their own research, so for the sake of clarity and to avoid an avalanche or misinformed followup posts that happen way too often, stop making **** up. Thanks.