Azathoth
Registered User
Well at least we didn't spend the last 5 pages arguing about Zacha .
The two undersized teenagers should not be mentioned in this post. They aren’t part of the problem at all.
Let us accept reality.
We have two undersized teenagers manning the first line.
Zajac and Greene are on their last legs.
Zacha is in limbo.
The team is constructed to hemorrhage shots based on it's personnel.
I don’t know what the defensive strategy is, been three years and I don’t really see one. Although I don’t think Vatenan is anything special, he is at least a second pairing d man and his addition makes the defense look respectable on paper. Yet, the coverage in our own zone remains an absolute dumpster fire. There also seems to be this insistence from the d-men that they rarely try to chip it out of the zone even when they are completely under fire. They almost always try to make a cutesy pass for a breakout even when the option simply doesn’t exist. This has been the case since Haynes took over. It doesn’t seem to be a problem of making poor decision individually, it’s like they have beeen told as a unit to engage in that kind of strategy.So here's a question I don't really have an answer for regarding the defense: is is personnel or is it the strategy? I know Greene has picked up cliff diving as a hobby Santini is still basically a rookie etc, but I'm starting to wonder if the (lack of) possession system isn't doing the D and favors?
Why would you assume that the same people who wanted Henrique benched are the same people complaining about Vatanen?
I don’t see it that way. Maybe you are making sweeping generalizations about this board lolI'm not. My comment is more on the tendency of this board to make sweeping generalizations based on incredibly small sample sizes. Vatanen has played a whopping 5 games (the first two before having had a single practice with the team). Maybe we can give the guy the benefit of the doubt until he's played 15-20 games?
i dont hate him at all but id like to see at least a mention of the officiating.
I dont like when the goalie calls out the players like that. Thats Lundqvist level garbage.
The ranger announcers even said they were shocked how many uncontested shooting opportunities the rangers compiled.
Kinkaid faced a ridiculous amount of breakaways, uncontested shots from the slot, and shots immediately following cross ice passes tonight.
You're telling me that Vatanen isn't an improvement over any of those guys you named? He's not an improvement over Lovejoy? Or Prout? Really? Prout?
Spot on!With every passing game, Zajac’s relative corsi looks worse and worse. And he doesn’t get loaded up close to 70% of defensive zone starts like Andy Greene does, who has a pretty bad relative corsi himself. This is especially troubling, as Zajac has always been a + in that regard throughout his career, save for barely being below 0 in 15-16 and 15 games in 11-12, which still weren’t nearly as bad. Zajac is playing like the Miles Wood we saw last season. It’s not just the 1 point in 12 games that’s troubling.
Miles Wood has been unbelievably good this year, he’s also starting in the D-zone quite a bit more than the O-zone and has vastly improved from last year.
Coleman’s numbers are studly for getting close to 70% defensive zone starts. It’s a shame that he’s so poor at scoring points. I think too many bad players get too much credit for “Doing all the right things, despite not bringing enough points to the table”, but he certainly would not fit this category. I’m still skeptical he has an offensive ceiling that’s much higher than this, but maybe with different usage he might.
Hall has a PPG though. He’s not gonna score every game.
This is more of the reality for this team. They're not better. Inconsistent as always. True colors starting to show and a lot of underperforming players.
Of course it was nice to be at the top while it lasted but it's time to realize that the playoffs are probably wishful thinking for this team considering the division we're in.
This board will always ignore the big picture in favor of the previous 3-5 games’ narrative. Always.
Sadly, I think this is the strategy and I’ve been saying it for over a year now.I don’t know what the defensive strategy is, been three years and I don’t really see one. Although I don’t think Vatenan is anything special, he is at least a second pairing d man and his addition makes the defense look respectable on paper. Yet, the coverage in our own zone remains an absolute dumpster fire. There also seems to be this insistence from the d-men that they rarely try to chip it out of the zone even when they are completely under fire. They almost always try to make a cutesy pass for a breakout even when the option simply doesn’t exist. This has been the case since Haynes took over. It doesn’t seem to be a problem of making poor decision individually, it’s like they have beeen told as a unit to engage in that kind of strategy.