I totally get why people are upset/ head scratching at Bowness choices at the end of the game. I would have taken a time out after the second goal and put out perhaps the 4th line or at least have Maenalanen and Fjallby out there.
However, I think that Bowness was trying to help get some of our scorers producing by giving them a shot at the EN. Connor, remember has scored in exactly 3 games this year, and one of those was an EN.
I'm not saying it was the right call, but I'm trying to make heads or tails out of his decision because for the most part, his player usage has been good. He hasn't been afraid to use his 4th line, and he put Samberg and heinola together, something you would never see from Maurice.
I'd like to see Samberg and Heinola split up, simply to get them some more ice time and spread out the risk a bit. The two of them together have a bit of panic in their games under pressure, 54 tends to hand the puck back to the opposition when trying to exit, and Heinola holds onto the puck a bit too long and tries to make cute moves. I would like to see 14 with 5 as they seem to have a vibe. Maybe roll with 44 88 for a bit, 5 and 14, and 54 and 4?
Also, just to close the book on that 5 minutes:
Let's not forget the Hurricanes are a great team with some extremely skilled forwards with good size.
When you pull the goalie, the strategy every team employs is overload the puck, funnel to the point, get it to the net and see what happens. With 11 skaters on the ice it is very difficult for a goalie to stop those that get through
Even with this strategy, getting the puck to the net is difficult because there are so many opportunities to either miss the net or have it blocked
Scoring one of these goals is an accomplishment, but it was a feat of magic to do it 3 times in 5 minutes - it really was luck in hockey displayed at its finest.
We were missing the extra battle on the wall, and that was a function of player selection plus I think those players simply being tired.