McRpro
Cont. without supporting.
Henri Richard has 11 cups. He's best player ever!!!Both of them won more in the NHL than McDavid ever has or will (in Edmonton anyway).
Henri Richard has 11 cups. He's best player ever!!!Both of them won more in the NHL than McDavid ever has or will (in Edmonton anyway).
McDavid has zero and he’s not the NHLs best player ever or either.Henri Richard has 11 cups. He's best player ever!!!
Orr did impressive things vs very unimpressive opponents at a time the league simply wasn’t elite or fully professional.Because his resume is tiny in comparison. Sure, he's done a lot at a young age, but who knows how well he holds up? Will he be in the race at 35+? He shouldn't be compared to players with 7 Norris Trophies, or players who were top 4 Norris candidates 17 years in a row until he's got some more hardware to his name. No one dispute that he's excellent, but one Norris is not enough for all time great status.
So now Makar is even better than Orr?
Henri Richard has 11 cups. He's best player ever!!!
Because that dude he was replying to is using cups as who’s a better player.What exactly is the point of saying this?
Not to mention the fact he outplayed McDavid head to head in a playoff series..I'm taking him 2nd in league quite easily. He's like a unicorn do everything 1D that's right handed and still hasn't even hit his prime defensively. I mean what more does someone need to do to be considered number 2 behind McDavid?
A hot take is having the guy who just led his team to the Stanley cup as number one, who is the same guy that most rankings have at number 2? Okay, friend.
What exactly is it that McDavid is so much better at? The 0.1 points per game difference?
Edit - didn't realize was about Makar.
lol I've seen people compare him to Orr already
Where as Edmonton fans seem to use dumb awards voted on by the media as the basis for greatness.Because that dude he was replying to is using cups as who’s a better player.
I don't think he's close to Matthews, Barkov, Draisaitl, Kucherov. Toews also covers up a lot of his defensive mistakes.I would say “No” but it it is definitely arguable given how he took a leap this year and still has his prime ahead of him.
“Arguable” seems to be the consensus from nearly everyone here.
Well yea, they are individual trophies that define the individual lolWhere as Edmonton fans seem to use dumb awards voted on by the media as the basis for greatness.
Awarded by the same dudes y’all whine about when they definitively call Kadri to the NYI.Well yea, they are individual trophies that define the individual lol
Ya kept him to 7pts in 4 games. He really shut him down.Awarded by the same dudes y’all whine about when they definitively call Kadri to the NYI.
Same guys vote on those dumb awards. I just watched Makar outplay McDavid in the playoffs. That’s more interesting to me than how Luke Fox or Weekes votes on some silly ballot.
Ya kept him to 7pts in 4 games. He really shut him down.
Well ya, cause we have nobody to shut down Makar!Outscoring McDavid...
This is all facts and people are mad that their generation of favourite players played in basically a non professional era that was a lot easier to dominate than today. Where the NHL was comprised of 98% Canadian players, players had second jobs in the summer and actually being a fit athlete was not a pre-requisite to playing in the NHL.Orr did impressive things vs very unimpressive opponents at a time the league simply wasn’t elite or fully professional.
Hockey always been a niche sport but back then it wasn’t even all that international.
Dominating 1960s NHL hockey is no where near as impressive as being elite in 2022.
Amazing player in his era but Orr’s era was a weak one for the sport. Like being great in MLB before black and hispanic players were competing. Babe Ruth dominated weak opponents given the huge number of potential players that weren’t allowed to compete.
in a somewhat similar vein, what Orr did in his day is just not as impressive as being the best against the actual best… which you have in today’s game.
Exactly. And Russians now play in the NHL. So do Sweds, Fins, kids from Arizona that lead the NHL in goals… it’s so much more competitive today.This is all facts and people are mad that their generation of favourite players played in basically a non professional era that was a lot easier to dominate than today. Where the NHL was comprised of 98% Canadian players, players had second jobs in the summer and actually being a fit athlete was not a pre-requisite to playing in the NHL.
Of course its going to be easier to stick out in an era where half the players smoke between periods and have no specialized training for anything let alone even work out during the summer.
Dominating in todays age is dominating against a league of professionals who are paid millions to play hockey. A league of players who've had stickhandling, power skating, shooting coaches since they were kids.
Just like certain F1 teams had amazing cars that dominated for their era you would be lying if you said any F1 car from the 1960's would beat a modern F1 car today.
Crosby had about 225 points in his first 2 seasons. youngest to win a scoring title in any sport. nowhere near top 3But if Makar has more individual awards than any other defenseman in the history of the league through a players age 23 season, sans Orr, how exactly is he overrated if he is being compared to the all time greats. Obviously, there is still hopefully a long career to go, but when a player has a start to a career like this, they are going to be compared to the best. Happened with Crosby, and happened with McDavid.