Yes, he is legit
I don't watch a lot of him... is Johan Franzen a good comparison?
He's basically this generations version of Dave Andreychuk (clearly a better skater though) at the moment. He's not a top player in the league, but the guy can finish and is highly effective in his role.
I like Tim Kerr as a comparison point but Andreychuk works as well
Another "flukey" goal for Lee, 20 for the season
Who's calling it flukey? Guy has hands of absolute gold in front of the net, I'd do dirty things to have a guy like that with Kopitar
Standing in front of the net and having pucks bounce off your skate, your butt, or another part of your body does not qualify as skill in my eyes. Oh yea! He does knock in a rebound from time to time!
He is a strong and tough player, but skilled he is not. His line mates make him. He just reaps the rewards.
He won’t let Tavares overtake him in goals lol
as long as Tavares is getting the assists, I am not sure he is caring all to much
It's sort of funny for the amount of goals Lee has, Tavares doesn't have many primary assists on them(although he does have many secondary ones).
Love this guy's game, just not tonight
Who's calling it flukey? Guy has hands of absolute gold in front of the net, I'd do dirty things to have a guy like that with Kopitar
It's sort of funny for the amount of goals Lee has, Tavares doesn't have many primary assists on them(although he does have many secondary ones).
This primary assist thing has to go. Not picking on you because I'm seeing it everywhere now, but why did this become a thing? I guess just because it can be quantified.
The reason that secondary assists started being counted is because they are so crucial to setting up scoring plays. Now we want to credit them less? Sure, Barzal makes a sick pass on the 2 on 1 to end the game, which is a good example of needing a skill player to make the primary assist. But Barzal enters the zone cleanly and dishes to Bailey perfectly and doesn't even get an assist on the tying goal.
A lot of times the guy who enters the zone and controls play will make the 1st crucial pass which then connects to the 2nd pass or ends up as a shot on net for a rebound. Why discredit this? Tavares makes a ton of necessary plays and opens up a lot of ice for Lee to do what he does.
But it raised an interesting question. A probability of a goal is basically a probability of 2 good passes and 1 good shot in a row. Taking into account that probabilities should be multiplied, one can say that a secondary assist is not as important as a first one. While a first assist is not as important as a shot itself. So it is unfair actually to give the same amount of points to each guy who took part in a combination. Shooter basically should have 3 points, primary guy - 2 and secondary - 1 point, for example.My comment was nothing to do about the importance of secondary assists, it's more a comment on how we don't get many Tavares to Lee goals(which I am guessing most people would assume the bulk of Lee goals are Tavares to Lee). It's a basic case the way these 2 feed off eachother is they open the ice for the other one to do their thing. It's a reason why Bailey fits perfectly with those 2 because as they open the ice, Bailey's role is to pick one of three options(Try shoot to get a Lee deflection, pass to Tavares or pass to the open Defense)
But it raised an interesting question. A probability of a goal is basically a probability of 2 good passes and 1 good shot in a row. Taking into account that probabilities should be multiplied, one can say that a secondary assist is not as important as a first one. While a first assist is not as important as a shot itself. So it is unfair actually to give the same amount of points to each guy who took part in a combination. Shooter basically should have 3 points, primary guy - 2 and secondary - 1 point, for example.
That's not how probability worksBut it raised an interesting question. A probability of a goal is basically a probability of 2 good passes and 1 good shot in a row. Taking into account that probabilities should be multiplied, one can say that a secondary assist is not as important as a first one. While a first assist is not as important as a shot itself. So it is unfair actually to give the same amount of points to each guy who took part in a combination. Shooter basically should have 3 points, primary guy - 2 and secondary - 1 point, for example.
Sure man, whatever you want. The Earth is certainly flat. And education is overrated ProbabilityThat's not how probability works