So let me get this straight. St Louis screws the lightning and Yzerman gets credit for the the return he's got. In the same freaking breath, Holland gets criticized when he got screwed by Datsyuk and possibly even received a better return....
Sure you're thinking rationally?
Arizona needed to hit the cap floor. They already had
another retired player on their roster eating up a ****-ton of cap space. Meanwhile, Yzerman had absolutely zero leverage with New York. They had no reason whatsoever to give him anything when he had no bargaining power.
And quite frankly, saying "Holland's a genius for getting a lower draft pick" is one of the silliest things I've read in a while.
On the flip side was trading MSL for a guy that New York wouldn't sign to a contract extension themselves and was their dump not obvious as well.... You guys would be crushing Holland all day long if he then extended him, try doing the same to Yzerman and it will make more sense.
I never said Yzerman has never made any mistakes. There's no such thing as a flawless GM. The original contention here, if people look back, is that Yzerman is somehow a poorer GM than Holland given the last five years or so. I'm calling super-********. Callahan also went on to have one of his most productive seasons ever last year, if people were conveniently forgetting that fact.
He had to buy out Carle and he needs to find a way out from under Filppula. A huge problem in Tampa is Coburn a big aging D-man is all of a sudden a tire fire. He has several bad contracts. You just don't have to watch the players every night and concoct more reasons to hate the GM for it. Did Datsyuk not just screw us over too?
Once again, Tampa beat us twice in the playoffs and just went on a Cup run. Yzerman also apparently has the X-Men superpower of actually being able to trade roster players, something that is apparently Holland's kryptonite.
And do we really want to have a "bad contracts" debate about Holland? I promise it won't end well for Kenny.
Which is on to the second point, Datsyuk quitting on his commitment shouldn't be applauded and if that is the reason he should have the courage to admit it, which he didn't do either. This line of thinking is so absurd. The apologies for Datsyuk I will never ever understand, especially with the way this fanbase hunted a guy that left in actual Free Agency.
He did trade down two spots while still drafting Mantha and snagging Bertuzzi.
Saying that it might've been a reason why Datsyuk left is not excusing Datsyuk in the same breath. It's just an angle I find to be very compelling.
I would ****ing hope that an elite wing would land you a decent player and some prospects. You don't have to trade a player just because he asks for it.Whereas Detroit HAD to trade Datsyuk because he was just going to retire. Eventually had Yzerman held strong, Marty would have either gotten back in line because he wouldn't want to give up the huge contract he was making or he'd realize that he might have to lighten up on the whole "only NYR" thing. Hell, look at what Yzerman did with Drouin and Stamkos. Those were exceptional GM moves. Player pouts and tries to force trade? Tell him to pound sand. We will trade if we get value, not before. Player tries negotiating in the press and drumming up a bidding war? You hold to your deal because you know it is a good one. Get the guy for almost 2M lower cap hit than anyone else was gonna.
So Yzerman holds Drouin and Stamkos' feet to the fire and wins out in the end, but doesn't do the same to St. Louis. That tells me one of two things:
1. Yzerman
suddenly realized he could actually do that (I highly, highly doubt it)
2. The specifics of the situation were different and Yzerman knew that Marty wasn't going to play ball
And given Marty's utterly petulant behavior toward the end, I know who I'm giving the benefit of the doubt to.
And if you really break down that Datsyuk trade vs the St. Louis trade
7.5M blank roster spot + 16 for 20, a second (forgot the number), and a million dollar cap neutral dump.
Vs
PPG wing + 2nd for 40-50 point winger, 2 1sts (both 28 OA) and a 7th.
It blows my mind that the trade in which an elite ACTIVE player is traded for rich mans Justin Abdelkader and two late firsts is hailed as "holy ****, look how good that GM did" and moving 7.5M of complete nothing to move back four slots and pick up an extra pick is such a stupid move that the GM should be fired because of it.
Never mind the fact that Yzerman himself caused the situation that pissed off his winger to where he "had" to move him.
You, and everyone else apparently, are conveniently leaving out the fact that Yzerman had zero leverage in his deal, whereas Holland was just doing a common-sense swap for both clubs.
And one last point... you could reasonably add Frans Nielsen as a chip the Wings got in the deal because they directly used Datsyuks money to land him in FA. And if you do it that way then... 4 draft slots and an empty roster space with a 7.5M cap hit for Frans Nielsen, a second, and the right to pay Joe Vitale a million dollars cap neutral.
lol oh give me a break
Holland could've been swimming in cap space if actually traded away players in a timely fashion AND didn't sign his bottom-sixers and crappy d-men to ridiculous contracts. Don't use Nielsen - a
consolation prize for yet again not being willing to make some sacrifices to get integral long-term pieces - as evidence that Holland knows what he's doing.