illpucks
Registered User
- May 26, 2011
- 20,525
- 4,973
What does my comment have to do with the Leafs?
I simply mentioned Montreal needs to end its discriminatory policy against anglophone GM's and Coaches.
That was my take on the question of this thread. No need to take it so personally.
I don't like lazy arguments. Montreal's language policy has nothing to do with the team's current state.
Yep.Fire Bergevin, draft well, dont hate your russians.
Yes Montreal's long standing policy of rejecting 99% of the available GM's and Coaches just because they don't speak French has nothing to do with the team's current state. LOL.
I love every part of this post if only a dumb not so social guy could see this! You explain the whole entire scheme of the organization!1- Fire everyone not named Claude Julien, Stéphane Waite, Trevor Timmins and Kirk Muller.
2- Hire Patrick Roy as the President of Hockey Operations. Why? Because you don't want him to work as the GM, since he's madder than a hornet nest, but the guy HATES loosing. So you want him to keep everyone in check, without him taking any decisions. Heck, you can even hire him before firing Bergevin, just for the lolz.
3- Hire Julien Brisebois as the GM. French or english, he's probably the best soon-to-be GM right now.
4- Find a way to dump Carey Price, and Karl Alzner. Shae Weber with a cap hit of 7M$ is ok I guess right now. I LOVE Carey Price, but you just can't pay him that money for that many years. And Alzner is just goddawful.
5- Trade Pacioretty for something good. You won't get a center I guess, but another hole we have is on the LHD. So maybe we can do something here.
6- Throw money at Tavares. If he don't take it, try to throw some at Paul Statsny.
7- Hire Plakanec back at 3M$ for a year or two max.
8- Maybe we would need a human sacrifice.
9- Hope that Mete and Juulsen are ready for next years, because a lot will depends on them.
It's not about "Good" candidates. It's about the best candidate. When one team has a smaller pool of candidates to choose from, they inevitably end up with lesser talent. Because the best candidate will often be outside their smaller pool.Did Toronto's long standing policy of rejecting 80% of the available GMs and coaches (all the European ones) have anything to do with the team's state at the time?
There are more than enough francophone candidates. Before he took over the Habs, Bergevin was just as qualified and well-regarded as Shanahan was before he took over the Leafs.
And tell me, how many coaches hired by the Habs didn't deserve the job? Just for fun, let's go back to the last Cup the Habs won. That should be a somewhat meaningful sample size, right?
Claude Julien: Stanley Cup, Olympic Gold, Jack Adams winner, President's Trophy winner, 18th in wins all time.
Michel Therrien: Stanley Cup Finals, NHL All-Star Team Head Coach, Jack Adams nominee, brought the Habs from last in the Northeast to first in his first season (second stint), and the ECF the following year. When he was fired the Habs were 1st in the Northeast.
Jacques Martin: 17th in wins all time, Jack Adams winner, President's Trophy winner, brought the Habs to the ECF
Guy Carbonneau: Jack Adams nominee
Bob Gainey (interim coach): Stanley Cup (as GM), Stanley Cup Finals
Alain Vigneault: 11th all time in wins, Jack Adams nominee (3), Jack Adams winner, President's Trophy winner (4), set Canucks franchise record for wins in a season, Stanley Cup Finals (2)
Mario Tremblay: pretty terrible, but his hiring had more to do with the fact he was an ex-Hab. He still remained in the league as an assistant for a long time after being fired.
Jacques Laperrière: Habs assistant coach for 16 years winning 2 Stanley Cups, was an assistant in the NHL for many more years with great success
Jacques Demers: Jack Adams winner (2), Stanley Cup winner
So tell me? Which ones did not deserve to get the job? Which ones were not good candidates? Mario Tremblay? So one out of the 9? Does that seem to support your argument that the Habs are picking poor candidates?
Well actually it's not as rosy as I make it out to be. There was one other coach who failed miserably as a coach of the Habs, even though he had paid his dues in the AHL and as an assistant. You may remember him: Randy Cunneyworth... Imagine that... the only anglo they hired was an abject failure, as the circus created by his hiring was a major distraction... It's almost as if the language policy is necessary... but that couldn't be, right?
So please, stop repeating this silly argument that language is holding the Habs back. It isn't holding Quebec back, and it isn't holding back its hockey team.
There is no actual language policy for the Habs. It's a marketing decision that adapts over time, and will adapt again.I don't like lazy arguments. Montreal's language policy has nothing to do with the team's current state.
It's not about "Good" candidates. It's about the best candidate. When one team has a smaller pool of candidates to choose from, they inevitably end up with lesser talent. Because the best candidate will often be outside their smaller pool.
There is no actual language policy for the Habs. It's a marketing decision that adapts over time, and will adapt again.
Was Randy Cunneyworth a good coach? He is the one they are referring to with the language crap plus now Jonathan Drouin because he has been playing poorly.You've just described a policy...
If Joel Quenneville or Barry Trotz become available, or any other top coach, the team would IMO be able to make the fans accept it. But those guys are available once a generation, the Habs would have to have a vacancy at the time, and they would have to beat out the other teams with vacancies. It's not as if you snap your fingers and the best coach in the league suddenly works for you. The Habs have had great coaches. Whatever they're doing, language has not been a factor. Once again, prove me otherwise.
Was Randy Cunneyworth a good coach?
Did Toronto's long standing policy of rejecting 80% of the available GMs and coaches (all the European ones) have anything to do with the team's state at the time?
There are more than enough francophone candidates. Before he took over the Habs, Bergevin was just as qualified and well-regarded as Shanahan was before he took over the Leafs.
And tell me, how many coaches hired by the Habs didn't deserve the job? Just for fun, let's go back to the last Cup the Habs won. That should be a somewhat meaningful sample size, right?
Claude Julien: Stanley Cup, Olympic Gold, Jack Adams winner, President's Trophy winner, 18th in wins all time.
Michel Therrien: Stanley Cup Finals, NHL All-Star Team Head Coach, Jack Adams nominee, brought the Habs from last in the Northeast to first in his first season (second stint), and the ECF the following year. When he was fired the Habs were 1st in the Northeast.
Jacques Martin: 17th in wins all time, Jack Adams winner, President's Trophy winner, brought the Habs to the ECF
Guy Carbonneau: Jack Adams nominee
Bob Gainey (interim coach): Stanley Cup (as GM), Stanley Cup Finals
Alain Vigneault: 11th all time in wins, Jack Adams nominee (3), Jack Adams winner, President's Trophy winner (4), set Canucks franchise record for wins in a season, Stanley Cup Finals (2)
Mario Tremblay: pretty terrible, but his hiring had more to do with the fact he was an ex-Hab. He still remained in the league as an assistant for a long time after being fired.
Jacques Laperrière: Habs assistant coach for 16 years winning 2 Stanley Cups, was an assistant in the NHL for many more years with great success
Jacques Demers: Jack Adams winner (2), Stanley Cup winner
So tell me? Which ones did not deserve to get the job? Which ones were not good candidates? Mario Tremblay? So one out of the 9? Does that seem to support your argument that the Habs are picking poor candidates?
Well actually it's not as rosy as I make it out to be. There was one other coach who failed miserably as a coach of the Habs, even though he had paid his dues in the AHL and as an assistant. You may remember him: Randy Cunneyworth... Imagine that... the only anglo they hired was an abject failure, as the circus created by his hiring was a major distraction... It's almost as if the language policy is necessary... but that couldn't be, right?
So please, stop repeating this silly argument that language is holding the Habs back. It isn't holding Quebec back, and it isn't holding back its hockey team.
Did Toronto's long standing policy of rejecting 80% of the available GMs and coaches (all the European ones) have anything to do with the team's state at the time?
There are more than enough francophone candidates. Before he took over the Habs, Bergevin was just as qualified and well-regarded as Shanahan was before he took over the Leafs.
And tell me, how many coaches hired by the Habs didn't deserve the job? Just for fun, let's go back to the last Cup the Habs won. That should be a somewhat meaningful sample size, right?
Claude Julien: Stanley Cup, Olympic Gold, Jack Adams winner, President's Trophy winner, 18th in wins all time.
Michel Therrien: Stanley Cup Finals, NHL All-Star Team Head Coach, Jack Adams nominee, brought the Habs from last in the Northeast to first in his first season (second stint), and the ECF the following year. When he was fired the Habs were 1st in the Northeast.
Jacques Martin: 17th in wins all time, Jack Adams winner, President's Trophy winner, brought the Habs to the ECF
Guy Carbonneau: Jack Adams nominee
Bob Gainey (interim coach): Stanley Cup (as GM), Stanley Cup Finals
Alain Vigneault: 11th all time in wins, Jack Adams nominee (3), Jack Adams winner, President's Trophy winner (4), set Canucks franchise record for wins in a season, Stanley Cup Finals (2)
Mario Tremblay: pretty terrible, but his hiring had more to do with the fact he was an ex-Hab. He still remained in the league as an assistant for a long time after being fired.
Jacques Laperrière: Habs assistant coach for 16 years winning 2 Stanley Cups, was an assistant in the NHL for many more years with great success
Jacques Demers: Jack Adams winner (2), Stanley Cup winner
So tell me? Which ones did not deserve to get the job? Which ones were not good candidates? Mario Tremblay? So one out of the 9? Does that seem to support your argument that the Habs are picking poor candidates?
Well actually it's not as rosy as I make it out to be. There was one other coach who failed miserably as a coach of the Habs, even though he had paid his dues in the AHL and as an assistant. You may remember him: Randy Cunneyworth... Imagine that... the only anglo they hired was an abject failure, as the circus created by his hiring was a major distraction... It's almost as if the language policy is necessary... but that couldn't be, right?
So please, stop repeating this silly argument that language is holding the Habs back. It isn't holding Quebec back, and it isn't holding back its hockey team.
Hmmm, why do you insinuate this was only Toronto's policy? it was common practice across the entire league to not hire European GM's. It was just the culture back in the day and many could argue it still is when you realize that to this day there is only 1 European GM in the NHL in Jarmo Kekalainen of the Columbus Blue Jackets.