Prospect Info: HF Mock Draft 28th Overall

[Flamesarmstrong22]

Also I went with Fucale. At 22 I say no to Fucale but at 28 and us having no second I say definitely take him! At 28 you should pick the player with the highest ceiling. Compher could become a good 3C, but Fucale could turn out to be a solid starter in the NHL, Fucale>Compher

 

[herashak]

draft fucale at 28 and use brossoit with a 3rd to move up the 2nd

 

[MC Ride]

After some thinking, I changed my mind so if Compher and Fucale end up tied, give it to Fucale

 

[tyflames]

I went with Fucale. While I'm in the boat with not picking a goalie in the first round I wouldn't pass over Fucale. We have 3 firsts and can take the risk. If Fucale lives up to his hype we have a franchise goalie. If not well then we better hope our other 2 firsts work out.

 

[Skobel24]

draft fucale at 28 and use brossoit with a 3rd to move up the 2nd

I'd rather hang on to Brossoit.

 

[Trae]

Gonna take a lot of criticism, but went with Jordan Subban, obviously it seems to be a big reach, but his upside is huge and we don't have a second. Montreal will take him in the second if he's there, but I want him and with three picks we can afford a risk pick like him.

Edit: glad I'm at least not the only one haha.

 

[JurassicTunga]

I change my vote from Mueller to Compher.

So add +1 to Compher

 

[Trae]

I change my vote from Mueller to Compher.

So add +1 to Compher

Can't let Fucale win

 

[Flames Fanatic]

I refuse to vote for lack of Hartman. Feaster might as well walk up to the podium and just say "Pass."

 

[Sventastic47]

Nic Petan

 

[SaintMorose]

I refuse to vote for lack of Hartman. Feaster might as well walk up to the podium and just say "Pass."

Hartman was picked by the caps?

 

[Lunatik]

Gonna take a lot of criticism, but went with Jordan Subban, obviously it seems to be a big reach, but his upside is huge and we don't have a second. Montreal will take him in the second if he's there, but I want him and with three picks we can afford a risk pick like him.

Edit: glad I'm at least not the only one haha.

talk about picking based on name. He will still be there when we pick 67th, mark my words

 

[Lunatik]

I refuse to vote for lack of Hartman. Feaster might as well walk up to the podium and just say "Pass."

from the OP

Leafs: Curtis Lazar
Flames: Josh Morrissey
Capitals: Ryan Hartman
Canucks: Samuel Morin
Canadiens: Kerby Rychel
Ducks: Robert Hagg
Blue Jackets: Morgan Klimchuk

Taken 23rd

 

[LetsGoFlames]

Went with JT

Fucale, Theodore, and Heatherington would be my next choices



Dallas has Boston's pick so they might be the team to take a chance on Fucale.

Wow. How did that slip my mind? I think I might have brained my damage.

 

[BRobMint]

How is Fucale winning?

 

[tyflames]

How is Fucale winning?

Our goaltending is going to be very bad post kipper.

 

[BrodieGoat]

No order: Fucale, De la rose, Bowey, Duclair, Heatherington would happy with any of these.

 

[Flames Fanatic]

Hartman was picked by the caps?

I'm aware. I'm saying I want him so badly we might as well not bother picking 28th if he's not there

That being said I want nothing to do with Fucale. We have lots of good Tendy prospects.

 

[HighLifeMan]

Ian McCoshen

 

[Wabbit]

I refuse to vote for lack of Hartman. Feaster might as well walk up to the podium and just say "Pass."

I'm really hoping we can snag Hartman as well.......

 

[Wabbit]

No order: Fucale, De la rose, Bowey, Duclair, Heatherington would happy with any of these.

I like all of these guys too, except i can't see them taking Fucale with all the goalies already in the system. I can't vote 'cuz i'm a lowly rookie but i really like De la Rose-gritty centre with size and skating ability. His point-getting upside is up for debate but he looks like a sure-fire NHLer.

 

[Anglesmith]

I'm aware. I'm saying I want him so badly we might as well not bother picking 28th if he's not there

That being said I want nothing to do with Fucale. We have lots of good Tendy prospects.

I assumed that you were calling Hartman "Lack-of-Hartman" as a slight, and saying that you refused to vote for him. Now I see what you're saying, it makes a bit more sense.

 

[Ace Rimmer]

I'm aware. I'm saying I want him so badly we might as well not bother picking 28th if he's not there

That being said I want nothing to do with Fucale. We have lots of good Tendy prospects.

Quantity does not mean quality. Fucale would be head and shoulders above any goalie prospect currently in the system.

 

[TheHudlinator]

Quantity does not mean quality. Fucale would be head and shoulders above any goalie prospect currently in the system.

I strongly disagree with this he would simple be the shiniest toy. IMO Gillies and maybe even Brossoit are at his level.

 

[Ace Rimmer]

I strongly disagree with this he would simple be the shiniest toy. IMO Gillies and maybe even Brossoit are at his level.

So you think he'll be no more than a career backup? Because that's the "level" of Brossoit (AHL starter) and Gilles (backup, maybe 1B).