I'm not as high as our goaltending prospects as most - I don't see any of the goalies currently in the system as bona-fide NHL starters.
Fucale most likely will be - won't be an all-star (potential is there) but he should top out as a solid #1 goalie.
The main reason that I believe that we can't say that Fucale is better than any goalie in our system is because there is value that comes with being NHL-ready. We know, for example, that Berra and Ramo have managed to get to age 25 and 26 without having their abilities permanently marred by injury. We know that they can get it done consistently. We don't know whether that will be true of Fucale.
I would add that Fucale's stats on the best team in the CHL were very comparable to Brossoit's on the WHL runner-up this year, and Brossoit has a larger body and is closer to being in the NHL than Fucale. In terms of age, Brossoit has about two years on Fucale, but given goalies aren't usually ready for the prime-time until their mid-twenties, they are probably closer on the development scale than position players of the same age would be.
Furthermore, while it may be arguable that Fucale is better than anyone in the Flames' system, that could also be true of 4 or 5 other goalies available in this draft who just haven't put it together yet. It's possible that there are a few Kippers in this draft. I'm in favour of taking a goalie in the low rounds in each draft, but I'm not in favour of taking one in the first round unless your forwards and defence are completely secured.
