LDF
Registered User
- Sep 28, 2016
- 11,778
- 1,172
remember i am a weird with a real unusual sense of humor ..... but i love it.2017-18 Blackhawks
View attachment 81707
remember i am a weird with a real unusual sense of humor ..... but i love it.2017-18 Blackhawks
View attachment 81707
Love the take that you are a better fan because you cherish the past SC finals wins. You don’t think we all enjoyed watching those with friends and family?
The point of sports is to win, and in this league with the salary cap, you need to win while you have an opportunity to do so, because as soon as your talented players are making assloads, you really really have to draft well or sign well.
I want to put my favorite team in position to succeed every season. Not just enjoy the last cup win in 2015. It’s not being a greedy fan, it’s how ****ing sports works.
remember i am a weird with a real unusual sense of humor ..... but i love it.
2017-18 Blackhawks
View attachment 81715
i too is an old timer but i will disagree with you on one point. am i starving for another cup, i am ravenous for one. i look at this team and all i can see is wasted decisions, wasted roster moves and worst a coach who over plays his players to what they are now, a shell of what they were once.Hmmmm ... of course all fans want their team to win every year which simply is impossible.
Three wins within 6 years is very, very rare. Sure keep on wanting our team to win but at the same
time have some satisfaction with the near impossible feat this team has accomplished,
Sh*t, I have followed the Hawks since I was a 9 year old lad in 1969 and had to wait 49 years for a cup.
I know there a quite a few on this board with a similar length of time as a fan and though I can only speak for myself .. I am completely satisfied as a fan of the Blackhawks. Do I want to see another win?
Sure, but I'm not a starving man outside the feast any longer.
As an outside unbiased hockey fan, I always thought Q was a middling mediocre coach. Then he went to Chicago and fast forward to now national announcers praise him as some sort of genius, a HOF coach, the job he'd done in CHI etc. but I don't think coaches just suddenly become "good".
Methinks he just sort of game managed (to steal a NFL phrase) great rosters put forth by management and sort of let them do their things, to the extent a coach can
Again, I'm an unbiased non Blackhakws fan so feel free to tear my opinion to shreds
If you call [over]playing your top players a ton "game-manage", yeah. The top Chicago forwards and D-men always seem to have far higher average TOI under Quenneville than most, if not all other, teams, in spite of Quenneville's preaching of preferring to "roll four lines". In the rare moments when rolling four lines did become a reality, such as when Hino and IIRC Motte were on the roster, it was derailed shortly thereafter and never reinstated again (Anisimov injury? long break between games?)
As an outside unbiased hockey fan, I always thought Q was a middling mediocre coach. Then he went to Chicago and fast forward to now national announcers praise him as some sort of genius, a HOF coach, the job he'd done in CHI etc. but I don't think coaches just suddenly become "good".
Methinks he just sort of game managed (to steal a NFL phrase) great rosters put forth by management and sort of let them do their things, to the extent a coach can
Again, I'm an unbiased non Blackhakws fan so feel free to tear my opinion to shreds
You just won the thread.
I expected the D to be bad, and it hasn't disappointed.Meh, Q's issues this season remain the same they've always been:
1) Roster management
2) PP
He's been **** at both his entire time here. Nobody should be surprised.
The bigger issue is that he seems either stubbornly unwilling or simply unable to evolve his system for the modern NHL. The D still aren't given a green light to skate the puck out of the Dzone or into the Ozone, the forwards are still deferring to point shots at 5v5 instead of trying to make plays (because trying to make a play is risky, whereas a point shot is the 'safe' play) when most goals are scored from the 'key', he's strangling offense out of an offensively talented team.
The shots surrendered against aren't entirely his fault. Most reasonable people that looked at this D on paper acknowledged it was among the worst in the league. People were just crossing their fingers they would improve over time. So it's not surprising the Blackhawks are toward the bottom of the league in attempts, shots, and chances against. Would a green light to skate the puck out HELP? Yes. Would it fix the team's inability to hold their blue-line? No. Not unless Forsling, Rutta, Kempny and Murphy all get way better at it. I'm not including Seabrook in that list, because I have no hope he will improve.
.....though I'd LOVE to know why Murphy was scratched after putting up a GREAT performance against NSH the night before. Dicking him around isn't going to help him improve. Though I bet he's longing to be playing alongside OEL right about now...
Great coaches can get results with what they have by playing to the team's strengths.Well everybody let's remember this. Q has no control over the cap issues this team has faced. The retooling after 2010 was due to Tallon. Thought he did load the roster with great talent, they couldn't afford to keep everyone. 2 years later they're back and almost go back to back. That's not so bad.
This team though now is getting too old with the core who are all locked into big long term deals, so he's stuck. Unless Bowman can move some salary and get some young talent we have what we have and I'm not sure even a in his prime Scotty Bowman could do much better.
Honestly, at this point someone who's not a completely bad coach (i.e. not Kompon). I think the best coach would be someone completely new that can manage the star egos--a coach that's not afraid to demote the core from positions they are ill-suited for (assuming someone younger can do it better--like Keith on the PP).Who would be the better fit for the coach spot if Q has to go?
ref to the coach input, well i will disagree with you. any good good org will look to the coach input and wishes. that will be taken a big consideration.Well everybody let's remember this. Q has no control over the cap issues this team has faced. The retooling after 2010 was due to Tallon. Thought he did load the roster with great talent, they couldn't afford to keep everyone. 2 years later they're back and almost go back to back. That's not so bad.
This team though now is getting too old with the core who are all locked into big long term deals, so he's stuck. Unless Bowman can move some salary and get some young talent we have what we have and I'm not sure even a in his prime Scotty Bowman could do much better.
ref to the coach input, well i will disagree with you. any good good org will look to the coach input and wishes. that will be taken a big consideration.
2nd some of the biggest failure in the salary signing is in Seabs. contract. which was all on SB.
Apparently Q stormed off the ice today:
I guess he finally sees what all our eyes have been seeing the past couple weeks. Tough to look at.