Rollyb
Registered User
- Jan 10, 2017
- 94
- 1
It's not gonna happen for #6? I see both of them as solid #4-5 defenseman. If you can get the pair locked in at roughly 4 million per, I'd be ecstatic.
It's not gonna happen for #6? I see both of them as solid #4-5 defenseman. If you can get the pair locked in at roughly 4 million per, I'd be ecstatic.
I can't see Kempny on this team next year. Keith is a lock on the left, and provided no trades occur, Forsling and Snuggerud will be there too.
Would be a huge mistake to let him go.
That would be a big mistake.
Like I said, without significant improvement from Forsling this season, I'd be more comfortable moving him for assets than Kempny.
My POV move Forsling over Kempny because we have D in the pipeline short term (Snuggy) and long term. We are in win now mode.
I don't see it that way. Forsling has looked a lot better in the last two games. He's young and has huge upside. Snuggerud is slightly older but also has loads of potential. Unless we're trading them for something of equal or better value, they'll be on this team next year. Which will make Kempny the likely odd man out.
My POV move Forsling over Kempny because we have D in the pipeline short term (Snuggy) and long term. We are in win now mode.
The good:
Forsling would likely fetch more.
The bad:
GF has big-time potential and he has started to show a tendency to get braver in his play, which is his biggest flaw, IMO.
Bottom line may be how Q feels. I don't there's any question that he likes GF, and based on last season, he doesn't think nearly as highly of MK.
The good:
Forsling would likely fetch more.
The bad:
GF has big-time potential and he has started to show a tendency to get braver in his play, which is his biggest flaw, IMO.
Bottom line may be how Q feels. I don't there's any question that he likes GF, and based on last season, he doesn't think nearly as highly of MK.
They will have to find a team to take Seabrook then all cap issues are gone.
What do you think about Seabrook + Hartman for nothing? Would you do that or keep them both? I'm just trying to look at it realistically.
At this point, I would rather trade a first or second-round pick. If a team like the AVs can take him they would be able to find a taker if they retained because a team looking for a D for the playoffs would be all over him at a lesser salary. I would not worry much losing Seabrook honestly because Murphy and Rutta are already better and Franson is a solid #6 D.
Friedmann wrote in his 31 thoughts that there are a real possibility of $5m raise in Cap. Of course we don't know that yet but it's possibility.
Realistic version of our cap situation is that Seabrook is traded with some kind of add and I think Hartman is something which we can afford to lose. I'm not that high on him, I think he is very solid 3rd line player in contender and fringe top-6 forward but given Cat, Hayden and Sikura, we have options too.
Not saying Hartman should be traded, BUT if Seabrook is traded with add, I think Hartman is the most replacable.
that is the truth to really think about it. but that is in the off-season. this team this season is set. all i want is SC appearance this yr. nothing less is acceptable for me.At this point, I would rather trade a first or second-round pick. If a team like the AVs can take him they would be able to find a taker if they retained because a team looking for a D for the playoffs would be all over him at a lesser salary. I would not worry much losing Seabrook honestly because Murphy and Rutta are already better and Franson is a solid #6 D.
if anyone remember the posts from the off season, i was ranting that hammer needs to be traded and Seabs with a 1st rnd and with Schm for a player to be determine.Friedmann wrote in his 31 thoughts that there are a real possibility of $5m raise in Cap. Of course we don't know that yet but it's possibility.
Realistic version of our cap situation is that Seabrook is traded with some kind of add and I think Hartman is something which we can afford to lose. I'm not that high on him, I think he is very solid 3rd line player in contender and fringe top-6 forward but given Cat, Hayden and Sikura, we have options too.
Not saying Hartman should be traded, BUT if Seabrook is traded with add, I think Hartman is the most replacable.
if anyone remember the posts from the off season, i was ranting that hammer needs to be traded and Seabs with a 1st rnd and with Schm for a player to be determine.
Well that woulda been bad, lol.
but this is how bad this teams needs to unload Seabs contract, now i am looking at the possible concussion factor . if that is what he got.