Pavels Dog
Registered User
Not when comparing to a team that won the cup without it.Which is exactly why the lack of a gamebreaking offensive talent is a concern
Not when comparing to a team that won the cup without it.Which is exactly why the lack of a gamebreaking offensive talent is a concern
Do people fail to realize that mediocre is on the way between bad and good?Seems to me the moves Yzerman made this last year (as you mentioned) will only continue to keep the club mediocre at best.
Ryan O'Reilly isn't an offensive gamebreaking talent. Ryan O'Reilly's best comparable is probably Dylan Larkin. If this is your best argument... then Detroit has their #1C right now.Which is exactly why the lack of a gamebreaking offensive talent is a concern
Teams stay mediocre that don’t have high end elite players in key core positions. Yzerman lacks those key players. I see Detroit in a similar boat to Buffalo. They are both much like the Oilers were when that team relied on Hall, Eberle, and RNH. They reach a level of mediocrity and get stuck.Do people fail to realize that mediocre is on the way between bad and good?
Name the superstar/gamebreaker out of these:Ryan O'Reilly isn't an offensive gamebreaking talent. Ryan O'Reilly's best comparable is probably Dylan Larkin. If this is your best argument... then Detroit has their #1C right now.
The conversation was about Tarasenko. ROR was also a clearly superior player to LarkinRyan O'Reilly isn't an offensive gamebreaking talent. Ryan O'Reilly's best comparable is probably Dylan Larkin. If this is your best argument... then Detroit has their #1C right now.
Semantically you can’t have a down year without having a couple of great seasons before, Tarasenko deserved some benefit of doubt. To win it all you usually need guys who proved to have sustainable top level skills, whether on the cup season, or 1/2 years before the cup season. Obviously you can have a sharp decline like Subban had, but that was not the Tarasenko‘s case, he was still good after his peak. As for Pietrangelo: again, 45-50 points five years ago are not the same as in 2023. Seider is awesome for his age, but he’s still no prime Pietrangelo i.e. top 5-10 defensman for a long period that is a reasonable definition of a superstar.How does your "scoring environment" argument possibly hold up with last year's Vegas team? Like, you see the contradiction don't you?
As for "historical revision", calling Tarasenko a 40-35 player is a reach when we're talking about cup winning teams. He scored 33 goals two years in a row leading up to their cup win. He was 23rd in goals in 2017-18, and 34th in 18-19, and 58th in points when they won the cup. The equivalent last season would have been ~36 goals and ~71 points. For how long does a player retain "superstar" status while not performing on that level? 2 years? 5 years? Forever? Is Tarasenko still a superstar?
Teams stay mediocre that don’t have high end elite players in key core positions. Yzerman lacks those key players. I see Detroit in a similar boat to Buffalo. They are both much like the Oilers were when that team relied on Hall, Eberle, and RNH. They reach a level of mediocrity and get stuck.
Career aligned I don't know about that.ROR was also a clearly superior player to Larkin
Larkin is decent defensively, but 0.06 PPG don’t make up the difference in two-way play. Yes, Larkin played on some awful teams without a chance to any Selke recognition, but I’m not sure he would have been close anyway.Career aligned I don't know about that.
Larkin: 584GP, 179G, 258A, 437pts, 0.75pts/GP
O'Reilly: 570GP, 147G, 249A, 396pts, 0.69pts/GP
I also feel like by praising O'Reilly and Tarasenko so much it only increases confidence in Detroit's build, between Raymond/Debrincat and Larkin/Kasper/Danielson. I don't know why you're deciding to die on the hill that those guys are superstars, instead of calling it what we know it is; a difficult build to win with.
Defense is a key core position.Teams stay mediocre that don’t have high end elite players in key core positions. Yzerman lacks those key players. I see Detroit in a similar boat to Buffalo. They are both much like the Oilers were when that team relied on Hall, Eberle, and RNH. They reach a level of mediocrity and get stuck.
Lol eh maybe but don't worry, I don't give 2 shits about you.
Seems to me the moves Yzerman made this last year (as you mentioned) will only continue to keep the club mediocre at best.
I’m of the opinion that not all Calder winning D continue on to being high end players. Tyler Myers won the Calder. IMHO we need to wait and see how Seider develops. Maybe Yzerman recognizes his younger guys aren’t good enough, so he brought in experienced players?These posts kill me. With Seider, Larkin, Raymond, Hronek, Walman, Bertuzzi and probably a full season of Edvinsson if you sign no one..... do you really think the wings were bad enough to finish at the bottom?
They have young guys contributing now at a good enough level that youre not going to finish with the absolute bottom of the barrel teams. So you can take a guy like Seider, and let him end up like all those young guys in Edmonton did with no help around them, or you can take your legit number one dman, potential one on the way in Edvinsson and the million picks oyuve made the last few years and start to take a step.
The amount that Detroit would have to go backwards at this point to just finish with the highest chance to finish 4th in the draft is dumb to even suggest
The players Yzerman kicked to the curb (read Holland draft picks and free agent signings) are easily a step or 2 below what he's drafted, traded for, and signed via UFA.I’m of the opinion that not all Calder winning D continue on to being high end players. Tyler Myers won the Calder. IMHO we need to wait and see how Seider develops. Maybe Yzerman recognizes his younger guys aren’t good enough, so he brought in experienced players?
It's a good thing Detroit drafted Kasper and Danielson who project as really, really good two-way players.You can easily build a winning team down the middle with a 70 point 1C if he’s a perennial Selke contender (O’Reilly/Toews) but it’s way harder if he’s just decent defensively. You better have a great 2C then.
1-3-4-5 came in St.Louis though, on a Cup winner and playoff teams - it's unlikely Larkin matches that in the next 4 years but it's still not a fair comparison considering you're using what O'Reilly did later in his career to put him above the career-aligned numbers.Larkin is decent defensively, but 0.06 PPG don’t make up the difference in two-way play. Yes, Larkin played on some awful teams without a chance to any Selke recognition, but I’m not sure he would have been close anyway.
O‘Reilly‘s Selke placements:
1-3-4-5-6-11-11.
A fan should defend their youngest players. It’s those players who fans place their hopes on for a better club down the road. I’m saying we need to wait and see how these younger guys develop. I’m also pointing out that Yzerman brought in several older players to help the kids because he saw (during the back half of last season) the younger guys aren’t ready or able to take on so much.The players Yzerman kicked to the curb (read Holland draft picks and free agent signings) are easily a step or 2 below what he's drafted, traded for, and signed via UFA.
This team has a long shot at making 7th/8th in the Eastern Conference, but is still vastly superior to the mess Yzerman was left with...The comedy of it all remains with the fact that most non-Wings fans are clueless with what's been going down in the D.
A fan should defend their youngest players. It’s those players who fans place their hopes on for a better club down the road. I’m saying we need to wait and see how these younger guys develop. I’m also pointing out that Yzerman brought in several older players to help the kids because he saw (during the back half of last season) the younger guys aren’t ready or able to take on so much.
Larkin has a higher career p/gp than O'Reilly.ROR was also a clearly superior player to Larkin
I don't remember asking.Larkin has a higher career p/gp than O'Reilly.
You didn't. You made an incorrect statement and I decided to help you out with it. Have a lovely day and double check your facts before posting.I don't remember asking.
This deserves a bump.
How long do people think proper rebuilds take? You cant get an entirely new championship worthy core in 2 or 3 years and If you do manage it it usually takes that core a few years to develop. I'm excited to see what Edvinsson, Sandin-Pelikka, Danielson, Kasper and Cossa will add to this team over the next few years.
Seider - Edvinsson the bash Brothers bb