New User Name
Registered User
- Jan 2, 2008
- 12,892
- 1,735
The United States has had the NHL for 100 years + now. And it rates hockey 6th over all. And generally speaking grow disinterested in their clubs the moment they have any long stretches of suck age.
So really...you are growing a sport in a country that really doesn't care much about hockey as they have other sports they consider their past time. (base ball, football) And that's never going to change.
On the flip side...in Canada you have an entire country who's passion and identity is hockey.
Expanded to the united states might generate more money, and revenue...players end up making more...owners make more.
How does any of that effect the over all "game" of hockey? Oh...you mean I get to see more variety of advertisements on the boards?
More tv time outs?
More hockey players on cereal boxes?
How is any of that great for the game? Like does it make the product of watching the game game or playing the game more enjoyable?
Players were signing up and learning to play hockey when hockey players were making 50 k a year. So it's not like you are getting a higher quality of player. Bobby Orr's era of hockey had player salary not even a fraction of what it is today and yet players still signed up to play hockey...practiced hockey and played hockey on their spare time. So I'm curious why we feel that it's "important" that we expand the game in a country that will never see the game as anything more than it's 6th favorite professional sport.
Explain to me how expanding to the united states makes the game "better".
MORE AMERICAN BORN PLAYERS.