Sojourn
Registered User
- Nov 1, 2006
- 50,523
- 9,377
The difference, to me, between Suter and Lindholm is that Suter is the quarterback out there. Lindholm is not. It isn't as simple as "Lindholm is very good defensively, so with more points he'll be Suter-like."
When I watched Suter play, I saw a player who collects the puck, slows things down, and just starts directing the play. Lindholm doesn't do that. This is where the analytics movement completely falls on its ass. Hampus does a lot of things very well, but he isn't the guy who collects the puck and starts directing his troops. Not yet, at any rate. The only defensemen that we have, who I feel, does that is Fowler, and he doesn't do it consistently enough to be "that guy" either.
When I watched Suter play, I saw a player who collects the puck, slows things down, and just starts directing the play. Lindholm doesn't do that. This is where the analytics movement completely falls on its ass. Hampus does a lot of things very well, but he isn't the guy who collects the puck and starts directing his troops. Not yet, at any rate. The only defensemen that we have, who I feel, does that is Fowler, and he doesn't do it consistently enough to be "that guy" either.