Situations don’t matter results do.
We are now in a position to succeed.
We are all hoping we will right ?
Of course we are, but you keep comparing results from teams that where given two completely different starting points and tools to assemble their respective teams, no? So forgive me if I don't look at the results as the be all end all in this comparison. Especially when I think the Knights season is a mirage and will crash and burn in the coming years.
I'm sure we would have looked great early on in our tenure if Chevy was able to acquire for free about 6 quality bottom 6 forwards as Vegas was or a legit good NHL starter for free.
I also think this myth about the Atlanta core needs to end. We are looking back on it with hindsight knowing what all the pieces became. When we got the team this is what we had:
Little as our number 1 C: The same Little that in 4 years in Atlanta had a career high of 51 points (As a winger) and was averaging about 40 p0ints as a C. It took him until his third year in WPG to blossom into a good mid level number 1 C but he hardly looked like a foundation piece when we got the team.
Andrew Ladd: had his first 50 plus point season in his 7th season in the league. He was already in his mid 20's when we got him. Once again at the time he looked like a good complimentary piece.
Blake Wheeler: Had a career high of 45 points in his first 3 years in the league. He broke out here right away but really hit his peak within the last 3 years.
Other than that we had Kane who was progressing nicely but only had a career best of 43 points. He looked like a core piece but had issues with his teammates.
Burmie: Rushed to the show coming off a 20 point system.
We had nothing in the system outside of that.
On defense:
We had Enstrom who yes was looking like very good number 1 dmen (The only legit established contending piece we had) Unfortunately most of his prime was wasted in Atlanta before we got the team back. He never hit those heights here.
Buff was coming off a great offensive year in his first year back as a dmen but there where questions about his fitness.
Hainsy was a solid 2nd pairing dmen.
Bogo was a young kid who was drowing at the time (approaching bust status)
Be honest while the defense looks ok, does that look at all like the basis of a contending forward core? None of those players broke out and became impact players until their mid to late 20's
Little 24
Wheeler 25
Ladd 25
Enstrom 27
Buff 26
I mean the window would have been crazy tight to try to win with that group given their age and the fact that only one was looking like a core piece at the time.
Look at it this way:
Our young core now:
Ehlers eclipsed the 60 point barrier as a 20 year old soft more, Laine as a 18 year old rookie. Scheifele eclipsed 60 points in his third year and 80 points in his fourth year. Connor looks to break the 55 point mark as a rookie. We have significantly better system depth with a 20 year old top scorer in the AHL and some other very good performing players on the farm. Morrissey and Trouba are a good all around number 1 pairing and Helle is a 24 year old starting goalie.
There is absolutely no comparison to be made between our foundation now vs. when we got the team back. The oldest members of our core are now as old as the youngest member of the Atlanta core sans Kane. Not only that but our young talent is significantly further ahead then where the Atlanta players where.
It hasn't been fun but I will take the road we traveled to get where we are core wise now vs. trying to spend assets we didn't have to prop up an ok but not great core and win.