Providence Bruins General Discussion II

Status
Not open for further replies.

GloryDaze4877

Barely Irrelevant
Jun 27, 2006
44,395
13,873
The Sticks (West MA)
Why doesn't Providence develop Senyshyn just to be--or primarily to be--an offense-mind goalscorer? Must he absolutely learn a 200-foot game in order to succeed and for the Bruins to succeed? Phil Kessel, for example, is a goalscorer who doesn't really do defense, and yet the Penguins manage to do very well because other players have a strong defensive game. The Bruins have so many players and prospects that do well at the defensive end of things that I think that Boston can afford to develop Senyshyn so that he becomes a Kessel-lite player.

Senyshyn is not Kessel IMO. He’s not the kind of player that will be allowed to ignore his defensive responsibilities just to score goals. Now that I think of it, is any Bruin allowed to do this? Cassidy has more of a leash than Clode, but he obviously values defensive play.

One would think teaching Senyshyn to play a 200 ft game (combined with his natural abilities) would give him a better chance to play in the NHL, not less of a chance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Estlin and Thrive

Tampbear

Registered User
Apr 10, 2015
1,662
389
Tampa
Why doesn't Providence develop Senyshyn just to be--or primarily to be--an offense-mind goalscorer? Must he absolutely learn a 200-foot game in order to succeed and for the Bruins to succeed? Phil Kessel, for example, is a goalscorer who doesn't really do defense, and yet the Penguins manage to do very well because other players have a strong defensive game. The Bruins have so many players and prospects that do well at the defensive end of things that I think that Boston can afford to develop Senyshyn so that he becomes a Kessel-lite player.
So we can decide he isn't truly helping the team and trade him away again? This literally just happened with Spooner, if they can get him to play solid 2 way hockey and still pot 30 goals I think we would be better off. I don't know if Seny will ever become what they hope, but I like the approach they are taking. They have a guy with all the skills and a willingness to learn what the coaches are teaching him, a guy we knew was extremely raw when drafted and was looking at a longer path to the NHL. We have Donato, Cehlarik and Bjork more or less ready for wing in the NHL. There is no rush to get Seny in the NHL so I like the long game of really developing him into the player that they want and not having all these guys' contracts all getting huge jumps at the same time while ending up with better players as well. Again, if he doesn't make it that sucks, but he has all the tools let the coaches see what they can get out of him, this is just his first year professional if there isn't a jump in production next year we should be worried.
 

Montecristo

Registered User
Jul 29, 2012
6,921
2,146
Senyshyn is not Kessel IMO. He’s not the kind of player that will be allowed to ignore his defensive responsibilities just to score goals. Now that I think of it, is any Bruin allowed to do this? Cassidy has more of a leash than Clode, but he obviously values defensive play.

One would think teaching Senyshyn to play a 200 ft game (combined with his natural abilities) would give him a better chance to play in the NHL, not less of a chance.

I think offensive players are definitely better off if they can play in their own end as well. I just don’t think it’s worth it to the team to have an offensive player who can score say 20 goals, sacrifice half of his potential offensive output just so he can be adequate in his own end. The trick is doing both. Limit your mistakes and be just as successful offensively. Maybe it will take this season to learn that. I remember being nervous about debrusk but then the 2nd half of his ahl season it all clicked. It still hasn’t for senyshyn and we are approaching the end of season 1. So maybe it takes 2.

I think it’s (at this point) more fair to say he’s disappointed in his first year vs that it’s been a roaring success. I don’t know why it’s so bad to say that. I think zboril has been successful in his first year. I think senyshyn has disappointed. I’m pretty luke warm on jfks, lauzon has been as expected. Can’t we make these proclamations? Yeah I’m sure the coaching staff has made them do things they aren’t used to. But why do we single out senyshyn there? I assume they want all of the young guys to do things to make them better hockey players that they weren’t accustomed to doing. The difference is that some players are doing those new things while maintaining the identity they had when they were drafted, and others are struggling with juggling it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blowfish

GloryDaze4877

Barely Irrelevant
Jun 27, 2006
44,395
13,873
The Sticks (West MA)
I think offensive players are definitely better off if they can play in their own end as well. I just don’t think it’s worth it to the team to have an offensive player who can score say 20 goals, sacrifice half of his potential offensive output just so he can be adequate in his own end. The trick is doing both. Limit your mistakes and be just as successful offensively. Maybe it will take this season to learn that. I remember being nervous about debrusk but then the 2nd half of his ahl season it all clicked. It still hasn’t for senyshyn and we are approaching the end of season 1. So maybe it takes 2.

I think it’s (at this point) more fair to say he’s disappointed in his first year vs that it’s been a roaring success. I don’t know why it’s so bad to say that. I think zboril has been successful in his first year. I think senyshyn has disappointed. I’m pretty luke warm on jfks, lauzon has been as expected. Can’t we make these proclamations? Yeah I’m sure the coaching staff has made them do things they aren’t used to. But why do we single out senyshyn there? I assume they want all of the young guys to do things to make them better hockey players that they weren’t accustomed to doing. The difference is that some players are doing those new things while maintaining the identity they had when they were drafted, and others are struggling with juggling it.

Everyone develops at a different rate, so I hate putting labels or timetables on 20-21 year old kids. Would I feel better if Senyshyn poured 30 in down in PRO and was solid in his own end? Absolutely. I didn’t see much at all of ZS (as opposed to a guy like Heinen, who I saw play quite a bit at Denver), but from what I saw in SSM he wasn’t really asked to play a ton of D and was a scorer.

It stands to reason that a kid like that is going to have to learn how to play big boy D before he gets to the NHL. I have made this point before, but it’s not like Senyshyn is going to forget how to shoot or skate while he learns how to play in the Bottom 6. It may take longer for him to see the NHL, but the B’s aren’t in a rush, and in the end it should be worth it.
 

Blowfish

Count down ...
Jan 13, 2005
22,836
14,840
Southwestern Ontario
Everyone develops at a different rate, so I hate putting labels or timetables on 20-21 year old kids. Would I feel better if Senyshyn poured 30 in down in PRO and was solid in his own end? Absolutely. I didn’t see much at all of ZS (as opposed to a guy like Heinen, who I saw play quite a bit at Denver), but from what I saw in SSM he wasn’t really asked to play a ton of D and was a scorer.

It stands to reason that a kid like that is going to have to learn how to play big boy D before he gets to the NHL. I have made this point before, but it’s not like Senyshyn is going to forget how to shoot or skate while he learns how to play in the Bottom 6. It may take longer for him to see the NHL, but the B’s aren’t in a rush, and in the end it should be worth it.

I want zach to succeed however Until such time I see Zachary play a game that blows me away I stand by my assessment. Fast straight line, wicked wrist shot, not creative or aggressive, just always appears to be perimeter playing. It's been 5 months since I watched him play live and looking forward to seeing his development tomorrow in TO. I could care less if he scores. it's the other things that concern this fan.
 

Blowfish

Count down ...
Jan 13, 2005
22,836
14,840
Southwestern Ontario
Packed Marlie house.

Bruins killing penalties most of first. Zach had a good chance going hard to net. And with less than a minute. Too many men. Good lord.
 
Last edited:

bruins repeat time

Registered User
Apr 13, 2012
3,084
570
burlington ont canad
I didn't see a problem with refs today . We got over a 2 man advantage for like 1.14in the 1st period on a weak 2nd call. I thought when Toronto got their very short 2 man advantage it seemed weak as well. Toronto was far superior in the 1st , providence in 2nd 3rd was more balanced.

Mcintyre let in one horrid goal , 1 not so good but made some great saves . I thought Postma was pretty bad nhl this yr but he looked really good to me today although he got the late penalty.
 

Blowfish

Count down ...
Jan 13, 2005
22,836
14,840
Southwestern Ontario
I want zach to succeed however Until such time I see Zachary play a game that blows me away I stand by my assessment. Fast straight line, wicked wrist shot, not creative or aggressive, just always appears to be perimeter playing. It's been 5 months since I watched him play live and looking forward to seeing his development tomorrow in TO. I could care less if he scores. it's the other things that concern this fan.


Koppanen and Hughes will be a massive boost for this team...Donato would make pbruins immediate favourites. There are definitely space fillers in that line up for upcoming prospects.

Zachery had a couple nice moments. A very nice net drive in the first and some slick passes in the 3rd. I can only hope the bruins are coaching him to develop checking skills playing with the likes of Blidth/Cave. It's obvious Zach needs to work on this part of his game.

I guess until I see him playing on top lines I won't know where Zach sits. He certainly didn't stand out last night. And this is the common theme for this fan watching him play live several times now.

DKH was a big fan of Brazil...why the bruins passed on this kid and risked taking Zach is very questionable. The odd thing selecting Zach at the time, was Zach was playing on the 4th line at the time he was selected. Risks are good but when you have 3 picks you have to go with those projected by so many to succeed. Frig!

Was disappointed Cehlarik and JFK were missing. :

Agonstino-Czarnik-Donato
Cehlarik-JFK-Koppanen
Seny-Hughes-Szwarz
Blidth-Cave-Hickmen
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: SanDogBrewin

Saxon Eric

Registered User
Dec 18, 2005
20,285
27,342
Forgot about this guy,thought he was meh at prospect camp but stats say he's did ok this year in the Q,the way Sweeney's been hitting them this kid will probably turn into the next Shawn Thornton...
 

Mainehockey33

Powerplay Specialist
Jul 15, 2011
10,225
7,764
Maine
Wish I knew how to watch these games online. Last year I saw quite a few games with McAvoy and then watched their playoff run. This year I haven’t found anything and I’d like to see how Frederic looks.
 

GarbageGoal

Courage
Dec 1, 2005
22,353
2,377
RI
Hughes and Kopp didn’t look out of place. Hughes had a chance at a fairly point blank shot and didn’t pull the trigger. Other than that he was fine. They shared a line with Porter mostly.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad