Yes it actually does when you look at each piece individually. DeMelo was a fringe NHLer who would be the 8th best defenseman on this Sharks team without Karlsson. Tierney is a 40-50 point center who is scoring out of his league as a result of increased ice time but he’s also getting absolutely shelled defensively because he’s out of depth in his role. Losing Tierney was addition by subtraction for a Sharks team who is able to use Hertl, Couture, and Thornton as their top-3 centers; Tierney is far inferior to all those players and with him in the lineup somebody would be moved to wing. Norris was a solid B prospect who had just had an underwhelming D+1 season in the NCAA. Balcers was a solid B prospect who was probably going to play another full season in the AHL with one NHL cup of coffee in his D+4 season.
It’s like if I gave you 10 shiny coins for a dollar bill. And you said that I overpaid because there were 2 big shiny silver coins, 1 extra small shiny silver coin, and 3 medium shiny silver coins, and 4 shiny copper coins. Yeah, that sounds like a lot when you put it that way. But when you look at each piece individually and assess a value to it, that’s only 89 cents for a dollar.
All I know is, when Norris was a Shark, I never heard the slightest peep that he might become elite. Not from even the most biased and optimistic of Sharks fans was there ever a belief that Josh Norris might become an elite player.