Replacement*
Checked out
I thought overall the D played a pretty decent game. They pounded the crap out of Nichols in the first half. But unlike your prediction, he didn't wilt like a wallflower, and they changed the scheme up in the 2nd half and went with a 3 man rush. I think they should have kept the heat on, and I think they were a bit gun shy when Nichols didn't fold. I 'm going to give him some credit, with his willingness to stand in there and take some serious abuse today, and then make some really great throws against the supposed best defence in the league.
Reilly on the other hand, had several plays where he all kinds of time, couldn't locate anyone, and either tucked the ball and ran with it, took a sack, or tossed it up or grabs. Again, I don't think McAdoo's system is doing anyone any favours, but for a veteran QB, he really needs to do a better job. Good thing for him and the Esks that Hallelujiah was off.
C'mon. The Esks D didn't make hardly any plays in the entire 2nd half and in the first half benefitted from half a dozen dropped passes.
obviously they should have kept the heat on. Make Nichols deal with the pressure the way Reilly had to all game.
Sure Nichols hung in there and played reasonably well. Where was that performance as an Eskimo? That's what gets me. Nichols putting everything on the line running the ball, evading tacklers etc. Wasn't doing any of that in Edmonton.
But the Esks D looked to be in a prevent hanging back set for all of the 2nd half. Why would any team play Nichols that way. Its exactly how not to play him. Even when the Esks got in the backfield their tacking was pathetic. I've never seen Nichols evade pressure like this for years. The D was bad today, real bad. Factor in all the FG misses and the D gave up a lot of points and real estate today to a very bad offense.