Waived: Ducks claim Lassi Thomson [Reclaimed by Ottawa]

Nac Mac Feegle

wee & free
Jun 10, 2011
34,902
9,318
Still a decent move for Belleville. We want some competition down there for the kids.

But I think this is kinda the end for ever writing him in as a full time NHLer down the road. Can be a fill in guy for injuries, but asking for anything more would be too much.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ColinM

DylanSensFan

BEESHIP: NBH
Aug 3, 2010
9,401
1,712
Calgary
Deliberate exclusion of Boucher?

Getting your bottom pairing AHL DMan to the AHL is a genius move? Seems more like a nothing move to me. People lamenting his loss were foolish for many reasons, but there was no genius at play here (nor even the opportunity for it).
What exactly are you on about, that you think he's the bottom pairing in Belleville? It takes longer to develop defenders for the NHL. No point in losing an asset that we've been developing for nothing.
 

The Devilish Buffoon

🇵🇸 viva 🇵🇸 free 🇵🇸
Dec 24, 2018
12,185
10,968
What exactly are you on about, that you think he's the bottom pairing in Belleville? It takes longer to develop defenders for the NHL. No point in losing an asset that we've been developing for nothing.
He was literally our 3rd pairing RD last year and we added Matinpalo.....

I'm fine with us reclaiming him, but this is basically just adding AHL depth. Wouldnt be surprised at all if we turn around and trade him for a 6th or something.
 

Tnuoc Alucard

🇨🇦🔑🧲✈️🎲🥅🎱🍟🥨🌗
Sep 23, 2015
8,077
1,920
Waste of time to be honest. He wont ever play in the line-up full-time. The Ducks did not even want him and they are on another tank-a-thon season.

Rather give his spot to High Risk-High Reward then a low-risk, low reward guy.
They acquired him to put pressure on the Drysdale camp to come to terms, knowing he would eventually sign, and would let Lassi come home, to Belleville
1696940598595.gif
 

Burrowsaurus

Registered User
Mar 20, 2013
42,443
16,056
He was literally our 3rd pairing RD last year and we added Matinpalo.....

I'm fine with us reclaiming him, but this is basically just adding AHL depth. Wouldnt be surprised at all if we turn around and trade him for a 6th or something.
Matinpalo looked terrible the second he wasn’t playing against AHLers and ECHLers. Not saying he is terrible but I doubt he’s a better AHL d man than lassi right now
 
  • Like
Reactions: Golden_Jet

The Devilish Buffoon

🇵🇸 viva 🇵🇸 free 🇵🇸
Dec 24, 2018
12,185
10,968
Matinpalo looked terrible the second he wasn’t playing against AHLers and ECHLers. Not saying he is terrible but I doubt he’s a better AHL d man than lassi right now
Maybe, but even if Matinpalo doesn't play a single game for Belleville Thomson is still their 3RD at best (at least based on how Bell uses & talks about the D down there)
 

Big Muddy

Registered User
Dec 15, 2019
8,641
4,113
Mantipalo doesn't look flashy, but seemed OK and likely less prone to gaffs. This is based on limited viewing.

Thomson has more offensive flash, but is prone to making defensive blunders.

Coaches might prefer the more conservative/safe player which would be Mantipalo imo. Not expecting big things from either though.
 

Sens of Anarchy

Registered User
Jul 9, 2013
65,348
50,011
Mantipalo doesn't look flashy, but seemed OK and likely less prone to gaffs. This is based on limited viewing.

Thomson has more offensive flash, but is prone to making defensive blunders.

Coaches might prefer the more conservative/safe player which would be Mantipalo imo. Not expecting big things from either though.
99% of coaches want the the safer player 99% of the time.
Caveat would be a PP specialist
 

OD99

Registered User
Oct 13, 2012
4,901
4,008
Matinpalo looked terrible the second he wasn’t playing against AHLers and ECHLers. Not saying he is terrible but I doubt he’s a better AHL d man than lassi right now
Let him get used to NA ice. He is a legit pro who just got here.

Give him time to adjust, get used to teammates, etc...
 
  • Like
Reactions: DrEasy

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad