LouJersey
Registered User
it huuuuurts
But doesn't watching McAvoy make it better? I mean he's the steal of the 16 draft. If you're going to beat them up for passing Barzal can't you be ecstatic that they identified McAvoy?
it huuuuurts
But doesn't watching McAvoy make it better? I mean he's the steal of the 16 draft. If you're going to beat them up for passing Barzal can't you be ecstatic that they identified McAvoy?
And I was told I was being "melodramatic" here when I lost my **** at the draft and said we would badly regret it (passing on Barzal) for the next decade +.....
but, yeah, now people all over the hockey world are looking up his advanced stats to back up what the eyeball test should have told the Bruins scouts on their FIRST viewing of him. It blew my mind how I could go to a game with someone and they were not enamoured with him, even though he had crap support in Seattle.
Funny, this time last year people were telling me how Barzal wasn't going to make any noise in the NHL because he "couldn't shoot" and, here, how much further ahead DeBrusk was because he was playing pro hockey.
The Isles have had their share of whiffs and we have had homeruns too (McAvoy, Carlo) but the reason the Barzal thing will haunt the Bruins is because they had the unique 3 picks in a row thing and that has never happened before. If they just had the 1 pick then people wouldn't hang it on them so much.
It could have been an amazing fleecing for Sweeney..... getting Barzal for Lucic is pure plunder but it wasn't to be.
I'm a Barzal guy but going to give JFK and Senyshyn time before I consider this a catastrophic pickBut how much better would it be to have McAvoy and Barzal now?
No point in doing a rebuild, either, because Sweeney likes to pick reaches over folks like Debrincat, Barzal, Konecny, and Connor. We'll end up with another team full of grinders.
I wish we had some new players that could actually snipe top shelf. If we don't get dirty goals, we don't get goals.
Of the current team, I'd say Accari, Kuraly, and Beleskey are the only grinders. I think most feel Beleskey is a huge disappointment, and pretty hard to foresee his plummet to the abyss.
But how much better would it be to have McAvoy and Barzal now?
But doesn't watching McAvoy make it better? I mean he's the steal of the 16 draft. If you're going to beat them up for passing Barzal can't you be ecstatic that they identified McAvoy?
Agreed
I have to hit the boards of the 13 teams who chose ahead of the B`s a few years ago and bypassed McAvoy and see if they whine as much as some on this board do about the "what if`s" at draft time
I cried for 10 years about taking Kluzak over Bellows.
Trust me, it's no way to go through life.
But how much better would it be to have McAvoy and Barzal now?
Someone brought up a pretty fair point though about why this is different: the Bs passed on him 3 times, not once. And while I don't know enough about draft prospects to be able to say if a guy should have went earlier or later, a loud contingent of people who do were apoplectic in the moment, so it's not like this is Monday Morning quarterbacking.
If Barzal turns into a stud and Debrusk and Senyshyn don't, Sweeney deserves all the criticism in the world.
Good post Mike, I think what I "try" to do when it comes to drafts/who was passed over by the B`s is wait and see how the prospect for the B`s turns out. I can understand why some here look at Barzal, putting some excellent numbers for the Islanders while Senyshyn is working to find his pro game in the AHL. I`m going to stick with my approach and just let things pan out first and see what happens with Senyshyn.
So many mistakes are made by every NHL team at draft time, well, maybe not even mistakes, has to be such a difficult job projecting where a Junior/NCAA player will be in 2-3 years regardless of how talented they are at that level, it`s, as we all know, such an inexact science. I look at picks like Heinen/Bjork, later round picks who are getting some NHL time now, good on the scouts who saw something in them a few years ago.
Good point.
Draft has always been a crapshoot. Players are still kids. Almost impossible to project what they will be in the next 5 years of development. Ray Bourque was considered a reach at #8 in his draft, 3 other defenseman taken ahead of him. Steps into the league immediately as an 18 year-old and is a first team all-star.
None of those D men take ahead of him were scrubs either- it seems like all three teams that "passed" on Bourque probably were happy about the picks they made, but you really do highlight what a coin toss it can be. Barzal may well end up great, it may be a fluke season for him but so far, the three guys we did take can potentially make the picks look good regardless of what Barzal or Connor ultimately become.
I am quite sure if it one of our 3 picks having that kind of start in the NHL while Barzal was fairly quiet or still finding his game in the AHL there would be no hesitation at all in declaring this all set and a win by our genius Bruins.
My stance is the guys chosen can make Sweeney look ok, I'm not closing the book on them. Sweeney could have made things less precarious and pick the obvious talent and kept this from ever being a debate.I am quite sure if it one of our 3 picks having that kind of start in the NHL while Barzal was fairly quiet or still finding his game in the AHL there would be no hesitation at all in declaring this all set and a win by our genius Bruins.
I bet there isn't one person on this board who was as pissed as me they passed on BarzelYou definitely were all over that. You started a thread before they made their first pick with the title "Bruins draft Barzal at either 14, 15, or 16."
I'd take that bet; I have a Barzal Thunderbirds jersey and, heck, I even got them to spell it right!I bet there isn't one person on this board who was as pissed as me they passed on Barzel