McNutty780
Registered User
- Apr 12, 2011
- 580
- 96
After the event of the trade today it's even more apparent that this argument is trending in my favor.
The first trade of the off season involved filling one of the biggest holes on the backend. Who would have thought? At the same time Chairelli also cleared more cap space which I also noted as a valid concern. It's fair to say that the roster now has three legitimate d-men that would be protected at the expansion draft leaving the rest exposed. Funny that I also mentioned how over stated losing a single player would be...
Regarding your comment about putting more weight into guests on Stauffer's show, obviously they know more then you do. I will take the opinion of the experienced who are involved in the everyday operations of a team over a guy lurking on the internet every single time. Also, just to clarify things, this is not my only source of information but rather the most recent and easily accessible to those that would rather type nonsense on the internet rather then educate themselves. You asked for an example and I provided you with one. Discrediting the sources is your narrative.
I know it sucks to be wrong but if you are truly a standup guy admitting it would earn you a lot of e-cred here.
Something to consider.
Sooo... Anyone want to change their vote?
Yeah, let's add an option to the poll "Well, we better damn well sign him now".
so some rumors have it that Lucic will get 7 years at 6m per.
eeek.
The date of the thrade just makes it difficult to understand the power dynamics behind negotiations.
To put it simply: Was moving Hall necessary to entice Lucic into signing or did moving Hall give Lucic so much negotiating power he can now demand whatever he wants from Edmonton?
What happens if Lucic walks into Chairelli's office and demands 7X7? What other options are out there that help Edmonton?
The other scenario is that he has already got an agreement with Lucic........so hence the trading of Hull.
I'd take that, I'd even take 7x7.
I'm not sure why he's underrated so much.
because while the first 3 years might be ok, the oilers would be stuck with a 7 million dollar cap anchor for the last 4.
because while the first 3 years might be ok, the oilers would be stuck with a 7 million dollar cap anchor for the last 4.
This seems the most likely... that is, given how things unfolded.
Chia waited until he had an agreement before he went ahead and traded Hall.
TSN rumor says the Kings offered 6x6. So if that is true it has to be more than that unless for some reason he just really didn't like LA. This contract could be really ugly.
So basically 90% at least like the idea of adding Lucic. Kind of surprising to me, didn't think it would be that one sided.
So basically 90% at least like the idea of adding Lucic. Kind of surprising to me, didn't think it would be that one sided.
So basically 90% at least like the idea of adding Lucic. Kind of surprising to me, didn't think it would be that one sided.
Do these agreements really mean anything before a contract is signed? Kevin Lowe thought he had an agreement with Michael Nylander once upon a time. Turns out it didn't mean anything.The other scenario is that he has already got an agreement with Lucic........so hence the trading of Hull.