How about we just finally change how the f*** we develop players? We've tried everything else even though I and others on here have been HOWLING about the player development issue for years, now. We are excellent at developing defenders and goaltenders.
We are horrific at developing impact forwards. We can develop two-way forwards all day, it feels like.
This has been a problem, now, since at least the early 00s. I actually think it goes back well before then, but you start getting hazy when you have truly different people in the upper management. Frankly, I place most of this at the feet of Sather. He's really the one constant with all of this and it is abundantly clear that his philosophy is something the organization has fully embraced from top to bottom.
He may only be an advisor, now, but I don't think anyone could convince me that Drury is not his disciple and that Dolan doesn't agree with his philosophy. The organization is broken.
And people on here just want a new coach. F***ing easy way out bullshit once again. But whatever.
Thats not going to happen when you commit to high priced talent. I'd love it if the organization stayed away from going after expensive UFA's until they have an actual core in place.
I said it way before it happened, Panarin was a really stupid idea. Not only was it a lock to be a net loss on ROI (and his decline has started even earlier than I thought it would) he was going to eat all of the minutes that could have gone towards a younger player. Gorton/JD couldn't keep it in their pants and needed to splurge on a big name when the rebuild was a little bit over a year old. This is not how you accelerate a rebuild, its how you destroy one. I hope everyone who pined for him is enjoyed his first season here, because thats the only year where he's going to end up living up to his annual salary (and its only going to get worse from here on out.)
Re-signing Kreider was bad from that stand point as well but as far as ROI goes, can't really complain there. He drives me nuts sometimes but with a 50+ goal season and another one that is likely going to be 30+ at 6.5, thats more than value (and if theres a guy with a significant deal they'd have no trouble moving, it'd be him.) Still, if your goal is to build a young core, he should have been moved.
Anyway, had they been patient with the process for another 2-3 years, they would have a better idea of what they have since those young players would be put in roles and get minutes that they'd need+ cap maneuverability+more assets to fill holes. For all the talk about how you don't "ruin" players by slotting them behind vets, those guys also aren't going to get better by NOT playing in key situations. Maybe nothing changes and some of the young guys aren't any better than they are right now, but at least you'd be able to say that after giving them the proper time to prove it. It's the reason why they haven't had any trouble developing defensemen, the coaches have actually played those guys.
On coaching: I think Gallant has been terrible this year and hes only made the issues worse, but most of the mistakes made by the organization were already done before he even got here. Panarin has his albatross buyout proof contract is a far bigger problem than Gallant.