BRoni
Registered User
Do the players also save money with no state income taxes here? I know that was a big point being made with the whole Dwight Howard choosing Houston or Dallas as destinations.
The big complaint against Tipp was the first round playoff losses. Ok, fine. But we got over that hump in a big way in 2008. We missed in 2009 but that had a lot to do with two of our best players (Richards and Morrow) being on IR for an extended amount of time.
43. 43 is the worst looking number in sports.
* Not to derail the thread, but why on earth isn't Federov in the HoF? We agree he should be, right?
I think it would be great to play hockey in the Dallas market. You're still getting paid the same, but you don't have to deal with some of the headache of fame and the media. Unless someone is a big hockey fan (and there are a number of us), they aren't going to know who the hell you are. I think I'd prefer that personally. Going from a contender may not be as exciting, but hopefully we'll get there too soon enough.
actually, you would be getting paid a lot more
no state income tax
actually, you would be getting paid a lot more
no state income tax
Do the players also save money with no state income taxes here? .
That is what I thought. So unless you are a total attention *****, it is a pretty good deal to be here.
Crawford had a more talented roster, but never got the Stars to the playoffs and is now unemployed.
They're just numbers. Just because it's not the number Gordie Howe wore doesn't mean it's not a hockey number.
The first thing I thought of when I saw 91 was Stamkos and Tavares. Sounds ok to me.
Looks like Seguin will be wearing 91 for the Stars this season. He had 91 on the Dallas jersey today at the press conference. Any opinions? Makes sense since 19 is retired for Bill Masterton. Oh and Horcoff will wear Morrows old # 10.
I don't think Morrow's wife was too happy about #10 being fair game.
I don't think Morrow's wife was too happy about #10 being fair game.
I don't think Morrow's wife was too happy about #10 being fair game.
Retired numbers are silly. Look at the Chicago Bears. They are close to "un-retiring" numbers.
I dont think 10 should be retired but I do think itd be a nice gesture to keep it out of the rotation for a few years.