On NHL Now, E.J. Hradek just suggested Joel Quenneville may be fired if the Hawks don't do well early this season. He also mentioned the friction between Q and Bowman. Thoughts?
Stan needs to be fired not Q
I agree and reckon Q's job should be under scrutiny beginning tomorrow. But if it happens, I still think it will be reported as Q's decision.On NHL Now, E.J. Hradek just suggested Joel Quenneville may be fired if the Hawks don't do well early this season. He also mentioned the friction between Q and Bowman. Thoughts?
Which is the right thing to do seeing that he brought 3 cups here (helped).I agree and reckon Q's job should be under scrutiny beginning tomorrow. But if it happens, I still think it will be reported as Q's decision.
Yes, the reason is because Ted Dent never developed much anything and got pissy when no nhl future taken was traded away.There is a reason they brought JC to Rockford (hot up and coming coach) and hired two new assistant coaches.
Yes, the reason is because Ted Dent never developed much anything and got pissy when no nhl future taken was traded away.
Hiring a no NA coaching experience 32 year old doesn't impact the NHL coach anytime soon. JC isn't likely seen as a replacement possibility for a few years.
Hiring an experienced coach to Rockford would of been an actual red signal to Qs job status. And not hiring another Whalers friend and the brother of the coach Q won a cup with and coached with in Colorado. But these aren't doom lingering hires that were made. They all lean toward Q staying a few more years
Yes, the reason is because Ted Dent never developed much anything and got pissy when no nhl future taken was traded away.
Hiring a no NA coaching experience 32 year old doesn't impact the NHL coach anytime soon. JC isn't likely seen as a replacement possibility for a few years.
Hiring an experienced coach to Rockford would of been an actual red signal to Qs job status. And not hiring another Whalers friend and the brother of the coach Q won a cup with and coached with in Colorado. But these aren't doom lingering hires that were made. They all lean toward Q staying a few more years
When was the last time this team went cheap on anything?i will still preach this, he will not be fired b/c of the money owed to him.
how much is his salary and the contracted yrs??
i will still preach this, he will not be fired b/c of the money owed to him.
how much is his salary and the contracted yrs??
while you make a nice point about the org, but 6 mil per yr until the season of 2019-2020 is a little too much to deal with. esp in the venue of profit and lost in the team revenue.When was the last time this team went cheap on anything?
while you make a nice point about the org, but 6 mil per yr until the season of 2019-2020 is a little too much to deal with. esp in the venue of profit and lost in the team revenue.
https://www.secondcityhockey.com/20...contract-extension-blackhawks-head-coach-2016
again i mention that i am looking at this from the financial pov. i like the idea that fans blows the budgetary part of the sports into some kind of non-entity. the owners do need to look at that part of their business. they ate what 4 mil + in the bickell era, due to bad gm decisions.If they thought firing Q would help the team win or was in the best interest of the team the would do it without hesitation. Where are you getting that this is too much to deal with?
Again the Hawks are not a budget penny-pinching team.
again i mention that i am looking at this from the financial pov. i like the idea that fans blows the budgetary part of the sports into some kind of non-entity. the owners do need to look at that part of their business. they ate what 4 mil + in the bickell era, due to bad gm decisions.
re of there i am getting this from, businesses needs to max their profit. just b/c my opinion doesn't agree with yours, that still doesn't mean it is not true. unless you or others have inside information ??
so unless you have proof of direct knowledge, then all this is circumstantial and needs to be taken with a grain of salt.Rocky has already shown the performance of the team on the ice is more important than fiscal performance. You yourself give proof of the team doing so. The Blackhawks are just a small part of a highly profitable corporation.
If Dollar Bill was the owner sure but Rocky has shown the opposite to what you are saying.