Doesn't help thst he doesn't have any consistent 5v5 goalscoring threats to play with. Playmakers need someone to set up, and he has nobody.
Tangent: I was going to type a response, went to http://stats.hockeyanalysis.com/ to check something, and it's down for good, along with its sister site, https://puckalytics.com. What do I do. Corsica can't get back online soon enough.
Anyway, response. That might explain why his scoring was 2C and not 1C level, but he put up points at worse rates than VandeVelde and Weise and most of the team. Is that really because he didn't have a sniping winger.....did they? Complicated issue, I know, but he spent plenty of time with Simmonds, our best 5v5 goal scorer. Schenn is our 2nd best goal scorer on the team, though yes he did putrid in that regard 5v5. But you could just as easily say that there were no goal scorers on his line because he wasn't doing enough to create for them either. He's never really played with a true goal scoring machine anyway, besides 1 fluke year from Hartnell.
Tangent: I was going to type a response, went to http://stats.hockeyanalysis.com/ to check something, and it's down for good, along with its sister site, https://puckalytics.com.
BSH went to town with G.
Is he new Vinny?
Tangent: I was going to type a response, went to http://stats.hockeyanalysis.com/ to check something, and it's down for good, along with its sister site, https://puckalytics.com. What do I do. Corsica can't get back online soon enough.
Anyway, response. That might explain why his scoring was 2C and not 1C level (though it was a complicated issue this year), but he put up points at worse rates than VandeVelde and Weise and most of the team. Is that really because he didn't have a sniping winger.....did they? He spent plenty of time with Simmonds, our best 5v5 goal scorer. Schenn is our 2nd best goal scorer on the team, though yes he did putrid in that regard 5v5. But you could just as easily say that there were no goal scorers on his line because he wasn't doing enough to create for them either. Two-way street. He's never really played with a true goal scoring machine anyway, besides 1 fluke year from Hartnell. It's not that his line didn't just not finish goals.......it didn't do much of anything, and he bears a ton of responsibility for that. Couturier put up numbers with the same interchangeable linemates.
What do I do. Corsica can't get back online soon enough.
He's still a pretty good PP QB. He does drive possession in a postive way at ES. His 5v5 scoring absolutely stunk last year & has been declining though. He has become too much of a perimeter player as well. So he does deserve criticism but not to that extent as Vinny had nothing redeeming about him.
I do winder if that is a coaching issue though. He hasn't always been like that
I loved G when he first got on the team because he played with lots of passion and his compete was off the charts. It's not about points as much as compete and passion and he is along way off of what he used to be. let's hope he bounces back.
Weal had no problem going to the net, and he's the same size as G.
I think G has gotten beaten up over the years and is contact shy.
Which is why he's far more effective on the PP where he has space and doesn't go near the net but sets up other players.
Giroux is insanely strong on pucks for his size. He's very hard to take it away from. To me it's mental, not physical.
He's had a ton of wear and tear over the years from the way he used to play. Multiple wrist surgeries. Multiple concussions and head/neck injuries. Hip/abdominal surgery. Countless slashes and bruises and playoff battles.
Meanwhile, the league has gotten younger and faster. It might look mental, but I just don't think he can keep up anymore.
I disagree. There's flashes where you see the old Giroux. He shows that he still has it in him, he just has to play like he used to.
Hak in interviews after losses said he wanted the forwards to go to the net more.