Thought we could continue the discussion
TSN Play of the Year, Giroux vs Turris. Turris has a small lead at the moment.
http://poy.tsn.ca/1-nhl2014/match/18-turris-vs-giroux
Was it you who type that Randy Jones remark?
If so I want to let you know I liked it and laughed out loud.
The history is strong here!
TSN Play of the Year, Giroux vs Turris. Turris has a small lead at the moment.
http://poy.tsn.ca/1-nhl2014/match/18-turris-vs-giroux
So...
How many of you guys knew that Giroux is not the first Giroux drafted by the Flyers?
I don't know if you're being snarky on me, but I thought it was a somewhat interesting piece of trivia.Really?
I don't know if you're being snarky on me, but I thought it was a somewhat interesting piece of trivia.
Ah OK. Yeah, it's this guy - Ray Giroux.No I was being genuine, I didn't know that they had. It's pretty cool though. Also, I wouldn't be surprised if we picked kapanen if he is there when we pick because his dad played for the flyers.
Funny how other fanbases gave Giroux **** for not showing up against the Rangers, but Crosby is doing even less. What a Robin. Testament to the Rags defense and goaltending.
It's because Crosby is the NHL's golden boy
Well, to be accurate, Crosby has won a Cup and Olympic gold (times two) so he really doesn't need to prove that he can get it done on the big stage at this point.
Well, to be accurate, Crosby has won a Cup and Olympic gold (times two) so he really doesn't need to prove that he can get it done on the big stage at this point.
When Crosby came into the league and was put on a team with Malkin, it was expected that those two guys would win multiple Stanley Cups together. They're both well into their primes with only one cup and not much else to show for it. I think it's fair to say that Crosby has underwhelmed at times on the biggest stage. Outside of his golden goal at Vancouver, he hasn't really done anything to say he was the best player on a championship team. He was invisble in Sochi, and Malkin was far and away the better player in 2009.
All he's proved is that he can sometimes get it done with a team of star players backing him. You swap him with giroux, how far do we make it? I'm not saying girouxs a better player, but he doesn't need the star power to get things done.Well, to be accurate, Crosby has won a Cup and Olympic gold (times two) so he really doesn't need to prove that he can get it done on the big stage at this point.
On a side note, after watching the rangers' suffocating defense hold Crosby and Malkin to a combined 10 pts in 7 games does it lessen the blame on giroux for his performance? Even though he didn't put up huge numbers he was still one of the best forwards during the series and he really has no one to play with with. If Crosby AND Malkin can be shutdown with a supporting cast of Neal, Kunitz, etc shouldn't it not be a suprise that giroux is held in check when he is by himself (with the exception of voracek)?
When Crosby came into the league and was put on a team with Malkin, it was expected that those two guys would win multiple Stanley Cups together. They're both well into their primes with only one cup and not much else to show for it.
And they only have that one because of an all-time choke job by Detroit.