Post-Game Talk: Canucks Kick Bruins Ass 3-2 OT (Boeser 2, Hronek), We Are So Back!!!

Canucks LB

My Favourite, Gone too soon, RIP Luc, We miss you
Oct 12, 2008
76,541
28,953
Figured I would read the first 30 or so pages of the GDT before I read this one. I am howling with laughter; the most bi-polar fan base in the NHL by a mile. Let's face it; we got lucky. The Bruins gave us that game with that stupid penalty in OT. Most of the team actually played pretty well I thought but the Bruins are a really good team even though they were on the road. If we meet these guys in the playoffs we won't last 6 games IMHO...
We outplayed them basically the entire game
 

oceanchild

Registered User
Jul 5, 2009
3,583
1,633
Whitehorse, YT

Zippgunn

Registered User
May 15, 2011
3,951
1,648
Lhuntshi
We outplayed them basically the entire game
They were a) on the road b) playing their backup goalie (who outplayed our goalie even though our guy played great) and c) shorthanded for the tying and winning goals. The whole team played quite well I though and even then we had a real hard time dealing with these guys. The white hot hatred for Boston in this town distorts reality for some fans.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Indiana

Britton

Registered User
Nov 28, 2008
1,696
586
They were a) on the road b) playing their backup goalie (who outplayed our goalie even though our guy played great) and c) shorthanded for the tying and winning goals. The whole team played quite well I though and even then we had a real hard time dealing with these guys. The white hot hatred for Boston in this town distorts reality for some fans.
In what universe is Swayman their back up goaltender.
 

Hodgy

Registered User
Feb 23, 2012
4,311
4,308
We got *unlucky* that we were down 2-0 in a game where we were outplaying them.

The win was a just result.
I’m not so sure. It was a really good road game for the first two periods for Boston. They did a good job of shutting us down. The Canucks absolutely dominated in the third but that’s somewhat expected based on the score (I.e., score effects).
 

MS

1%er
Mar 18, 2002
53,611
84,145
Vancouver, BC
I’m not so sure. It was a really good road game for the first two periods for Boston. They did a good job of shutting us down. The Canucks absolutely dominated in the third but that’s somewhat expected based on the score (I.e., score effects).

We dominated possession in the 2nd period and had several odd-man rushes in the first 40 minutes that weren't converted as Swayman was fantastic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: calnuck

Zippgunn

Registered User
May 15, 2011
3,951
1,648
Lhuntshi
In what universe is Swayman their back up goaltender.
Hey, you're right, he's played more games than Ullmark, my bad. Even has better numbers than Demko which surprised me. Maybe HE will get the Vezina this year. He sure played a whale of a game IMHO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Indiana

Wisp

Registered User
Nov 14, 2010
7,141
1,204
They were a) on the road b) playing their backup goalie (who outplayed our goalie even though our guy played great) and c) shorthanded for the tying and winning goals. The whole team played quite well I though and even then we had a real hard time dealing with these guys. The white hot hatred for Boston in this town distorts reality for some fans.
imagine trying to spin Swayman as a backup goalie. He's started more games than Linus Ullmark and repped the Bruins at the All Star game. maybe stop to examine what else you might be wrong about because that's just the tip of the iceburg.
 

Zarpan

Registered User
Apr 27, 2010
2,090
185
Vancouver
Hey, you're right, he's played more games than Ullmark, my bad. Even has better numbers than Demko which surprised me. Maybe HE will get the Vezina this year. He sure played a whale of a game IMHO.

Swayman has played well this year, but it will be hard for him to win the Vezina if he ends up with around 45 games played for the season.
 

Hodgy

Registered User
Feb 23, 2012
4,311
4,308
Anyone who didn't see the Canucks outplay the Bruins for the majority of the game is delusional.
I think this is true, but road teams that are leading generally get outplayed. Bruins played a really good road game until the third when they gave up more than they would have lined. But still, they were like 60 seconds away from the win.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Indiana

Nucker101

Foundational Poster
Apr 2, 2013
21,077
16,499
One thing I'll say about Boston is that I love their in-zone defensive play. They're one of the best teams at boxing out forwards near the front of the net, reminds me a lot of Sutter's Kings teams. Tocchet was well aware of this so his layers of screens/traffic strategy makes sense since boxing out in the bumper/high slot area is not as easy as net front, and I feel like defenders are also more likely to get called for interference/holding if they box out in more less crowded areas further away from the crease.

First period was pretty even.

Second we significantly outplayed them.

Third we absolutely blew the doors off them.
I think some of this was score effects though
 
  • Like
Reactions: Indiana and andora

MS

1%er
Mar 18, 2002
53,611
84,145
Vancouver, BC
One thing I'll say about Boston is that I love their in-zone defensive play. They're one of the best teams at boxing out forwards near the front of the net, reminds me a lot of Sutter's Kings teams. Tocchet was well aware of this so his layers of screens/traffic strategy makes sense since boxing out in the bumper/high slot area is not as easy as net front, and I feel like defenders are also more likely to get called for interference/holding if they box out in more less crowded areas further away from the crease.


I think some of this was score effects though

Both goals in the 2nd period were against the run of play and not really the time/score for score effects.

In the 3rd, sure, but when you score effect it that much you're playing well.
 

IDJOTBOY

Registered User
Jan 7, 2014
155
68
Surrey, BC
early afternoon we were downtown and walked by the bar in the building across from international village, i think it’s called the pint. and my wife was like wtf, why is this bar that doesn’t even seem to be an irish bar filled with ppl in bruins jerseys? saw a bunch of scattered ppl walking around west hastings in bruins jerseys too. who are these ppl and where did they come from?

a fantastic game. early enough that my kid got to watch through to the end and he was running around the house screaming after the tying goal and game winner. tbf he lost interest at the beginning of the third and went to play but he came back after i yelled after the first boeser goal and was riveted.

what on earth got into zadorov? he was like defenceman jtm out there. and i caught slack upthread for talking about demko winning this game but if demko wasn’t demko in the first period and during that flurry of weak play by us iirc at the end of the second, this game could have gotten out of hand. he was every bit as good as swayman, who also was excellent.
Hey man, Rogers is hallowed ground for Bruins fans. If I were them I'd be down to go to a Bruins game where they won the cup too
 

strattonius

Registered User
Jul 4, 2011
4,205
4,402
Surrey, BC
That was the most glorious win of the season.

Marchand looked like garbage. And not just because I hate the player. He was bobbling the puck, making poor passes and slowing down the Bruins PP. I've never seen him look so bad he usually scores against us.
 
  • Love
Reactions: Indiana

Reverend Mayhem

Lowly Serf/Reluctant Cuckold
Feb 15, 2009
28,280
5,394
Port Coquitlam, BC
I want him to pump up his value so we can trade him at the draft.

I want him to get to 40 badly.

I’m not so sure. It was a really good road game for the first two periods for Boston. They did a good job of shutting us down. The Canucks absolutely dominated in the third but that’s somewhat expected based on the score (I.e., score effects).

Yeah, I’m just not seeing what some other people are seeing because I think you can split the game right in the middle and it’s more or less symmetrical or whatever.

The first half of the game the only two real scoring chances we had was a 2-1 with a pass the went behind Garland because the D played it well. The other better chance was the Zadorov rush jump but though it looked good, it’s quite difficult in that play to score IMO if you raise your stick to wind up. Your accuracy is off-balance, the whole idea of the slap shot is you use the foot you step into for aim. So to do it in-stride and get a half-decent shot off takes a disproportionate amount of skill compared to how it looks.

Bruins I thought had chances before scoring where the Canucks were making odd-ball zone choices in coverage. I thought we were lucky the Bruins passing game wasn’t on point last night. And the whole unlucky to be down 2-0, I mean the 2nd yeah sure. I don’t know how a piss poor judgment call to pinch is luck, though. Can someone explain that to me really slow? That just seems like a player you chose to have on the team.

And while it’s normal to carry the run of play down with score effects, I would say that in the 3rd definitely it was past score effects and outright domination.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Indiana

Ita

Registered User
Mar 11, 2019
751
915
Figured I would read the first 30 or so pages of the GDT before I read this one. I am howling with laughter; the most bi-polar fan base in the NHL by a mile. Let's face it; we got lucky. The Bruins gave us that game with that stupid penalty in OT. Most of the team actually played pretty well I thought but the Bruins are a really good team even though they were on the road. If we meet these guys in the playoffs we won't last 6 games IMHO...
This is a hilariously bad take if you think "we got lucky" here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlainVigneaultsGum

Shareefruck

Registered User
Apr 2, 2005
28,948
3,684
Vancouver, BC
Interesting comments here. I thought we outplayed them on balance for sure, but as far as eye-test goes, I was generally more impressed by the Bruins game in the first period, personally (even though both were pretty abysmal on the powerplay). Especially defensively.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Indiana

alternate

Win the week!
Jun 9, 2006
8,128
3,000
victoria
Feel this win is going to set us up well for the home stretch. Always great to beat the Bruins, but snapping our longest losing streak of the season when down 2-0 50+ minutes into the game...just sweetness.

I was beginning to worry we had peaked too early. We hadn't been playing terribly through the losing streak, but certainly weren't playing 60 minute games, and things just weren't as sharp as they had been.

Now we get rest, practice time, and stay in the west, if not at home, for most of our remaining games.

I do have some concerns that our cushion in the division will lead to relaxing a bit, which can be a double edged sword. We've all seen teams that are dominant in the regular season and coast into the playoffs, but then have to play a team that has been scratching and clawing and the "better" team just can't find the intensity until it's too late. Not sure the conference, or even President's Trophy is the motivator playoffs or the division is. This team is still relatively inexperienced, so I've got some concerns here...but that's likely just my Canucks Fandom shining through.

The top priority going forward, give or take the trade deadline, needs to be getting our special teams figured out. Hopefully the OT winner will encourage Tocchet to get Boeser back in front of the net and give up on this recent obsession with having a RHS one timer. JtM up high. Boeser down low, make it happen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Indiana and andora

Bleach Clean

Registered User
Aug 9, 2006
27,047
6,611
Late to post on this one, a few comments:

1. Zadorov impressed me. This was a high point game for him. This team needs Dmen to push the play beyond Hughes-Hronek, and he did exactly that in this game.

2. Lindholm-Garland, yes, finally. Give him his own line and pair him with Garland. He didn't do much offensively, but he's now in the best position to succeed imo. Put Joshua with them and see what unfolds.

3. JT Miller has been excellent. He plays like this, and you gain insight on his potential in the playoffs. Well done. Great tactics to set up the Boeser goal.


Generally, BOS had the slight advantage in the 1st period. The run of play somewhat evened out in the 2nd though. VAN started well and then BOS had a late flurry. You could see VAN forechecking more than BOS, but the plays created by the forecheck were nullified by the BOS Dmen. Swayman highlighted this by not having to face 2nd and 3rd chances. In the 3rd, however, the dam broke. The Canucks took over.

I think Tocchet figured something out this game: Run the 4 centre rotation and let the wingers show you who they can work with.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad