cough cough think you gave me a cold it should kick in on tues morning! lolI think I’ll be sick that day
cough cough think you gave me a cold it should kick in on tues morning! lolI think I’ll be sick that day
Iffy on the d-pairs but the forwards is pretty much my ideal lines, except for switching Leivo & JVR as Kadri's shown chemistry with JVR, while Matthews has looked magic with Leivo.
For D, I think our current top pair with Gardiner-Carrick and Borgman-Zaitsev filling the bottom 4. Gardiner-Carrick has looked great in the minutes they've gotten surprisingly, and then you have to hope the other pair isn't a travesty.
But man does the LD depth point to a Gardiner trade in the offseason..
Lets hope this so called "defensive style" is just an experiment that Babcock is doing. Cause if its permanent, well umm...
I could be wrong but I think it's because the Montreal team we faced eventually ended up in CarolinaSeriously the most random opponent to mark a 100 year anniversary game.
Babcock says he wants to win every night. Do you really think he wants to throw away wins by treating games as practices to test strategies? This is exactly how he wants to play, he's praised the way we've played in his post game interviewsLets hope this so called "defensive style" is just an experiment that Babcock is doing. Cause if its permanent, well umm...
Pulling my daughter out of school at noon and heading down.I don't believe I will make an effort to watch this game.
Forget it. Life/work is more important than one game.
Enjoy the game for those who want that luxury.
If you're trying to teach someone to golf, do you have them swing a club or do you have them sit around and watch a significantly worse golfer?I look at the young Leaf core like a golf swing. There's some bad mechanics, so the coach is redefining the swing to make it more reliable, which means you take a step back beforegetting comfortable then you put it all together and come out the better for it. There is an end game here, these aren't stupid people running the show in Toronto.
If you're trying to teach someone to golf, do you have them swing a club or do you have them sit around and watch a significantly worse golfer?
The reason this doesn't hold up to me is that first of all, giving our young players like Kapanen and Carrick no minutes does not help them at all in that way. Giving Nylander and Marner 4th line duty and minimal minutes doesn't help them in that way.
Babcock claims he wants to win every night. You can't try to win and also be treating the game as an experiment while benching your best players
Babcock says he wants to win every night. Do you really think he wants to throw away wins by treating games as practices to test strategies? This is exactly how he wants to play, he's praised the way we've played in his post game interviews
If I was to guess, Matthews will be back. Kapanen and Leivo will sit. Polak stays in.
yeah I obviously agree that watching tapes and stuff are important for development, but as I said, sitting on the bench so that Komarov can get his 20 minutes is not important for development. Nylander sitting on the bench for the whole 3rd period against Pittsburgh is what I'm talking about. Doing something like that does nothing to help a player improve his gameWhen you are trying to teach someone to chip out of bunkers, you are going to show them examples using golfers that are great at getting out of bunkers.
If you are trying to teach a hockey player proper positioning, you are going to have them watch a player that is good at proper positioning.
Babcock isn’t telling Nylander and Marner to watch everything Komarov does, or Marleau does, or JVR does, because Marner/Nylander are better, if not significantly better than those players at some things.
However, there’s some aspects, that those players are better at than they are as well, probably away from the puck.
Overall, should Nylander or Marner be on the 4th line? No. But studying even minor aspects of another players game can only help you.
Heck, look at Mark Schiefele. He says he’s watching hockey whenever he’s away from the rink. He says it’s not only for when he faces other teams/players, but he learns things. He called out Josh Bailey, saying he loves watching him play.
So are Nylander/Marner better than Komarov? Without a doubt. Are there things those two can learn by watching Komarov? Also yes.
Does that mean they need to be played with Dominic Moore and Matt Martin in order to watch and learn? No.
yeah I obviously agree that watching tapes and stuff are important for development, but as I said, sitting on the bench so that Komarov can get his 20 minutes is not important for development. Nylander sitting on the bench for the whole 3rd period against Pittsburgh is what I'm talking about. Doing something like that does nothing to help a player improve his game
even if that were the case, it doesn't explain why Kapanen/Leivo don't get more games. They're young players who might have a future on this team, isn't it important for them to get their games shaped by Babcock? Carrick is our 2nd youngest defenseman and he can't even crack the lineup no matter how many poor games Polak has. I think what we're seeing here is Babcock is genuinely thinks that the way he creates the lineup and allocates ice time is what gives us the best chance to win every night rather than any kind of developmental thing. To me that's an issue.Yeah, we’re all on the same page.
I do wonder how much of it is managing the kids ice time though.
Yes, if early season performance was important, the Habs would have won the last two cups. It's all about positioning right now, and I love the fact we are where we are in the standings despite key players not firing.This team is a work in progress. I have faith that Lou, Babs and his coaching will right the ship in time for the playoffs. Once the playoffs start nobody will remember or give a crap that they pooped the bed this past week.