BLKHKhockey
Registered User
- Aug 28, 2009
- 701
- 493
The thing about Bedard, and how you kind of know he'll be a special offensive player, is he's put up solid numbers on a terrible team and kind of been inconsistent imo, we have yet to see his full 60 minute A game imo, but even with his C/B game he still puts up points and he just turned 18 a few months ago...That's the Kane trait where you say man he wasn't good or he was inconsistent last games but somehow he still collected multiple points and contributed far above league average, it will probably be the same deal with BedardI knew my feelings were irrational/illogical. That's why I asked everyone to talk me off the ledge.
I'm embarrassed about ever posting it. Should have kept it to myself.
Move along.
Absolutely.Bedard is literally the last of the problems with this team. His shot is starting to hit the net. Wait until they start playing the Sharks and Ducks.
Bedard approaching 1/10th of the season is looking more like rookie Jack Hughes than rookie Austin Mathews or Conner McDavid. I'll agree with the tough schedule, snake bit, very little to play with, but I am also suspecting it may take a season or two to get to the elite superstar level (unrealistic out of the gate) expectations.
Hughes wasn't given top line minutes and favorable deployment for most, if not the entirety, of his rookie year, IIRC.Bedard is on pace for double the production of Hughes rookie season.
Bedard approaching 1/10th of the season
Hughes had 52 points in 117 games in first two seasons, and I'm not sure you can point to top line minutes and 'favorable deployment' as a notch in Bedard's favor, he's getting the toughest matchups each night and plays with 3rd-4th line forwards...he's not exactly in a favorable spot to put up huge numbersHughes wasn't given top line minutes and favorable deployment for most, if not the entirety, of his rookie year, IIRC.
With that said, I wouldn't be upset with the kid having a Hughes-like development arc. I think he will come around quicker than that, though.
Fair points. I was just pointing out there's more context to the comparison of Bedard's point totals vs Hughes'.Hughes had 52 points in 117 games in first two seasons, and I'm not sure you can point to top line minutes and 'favorable deployment' as a notch in Bedard's favor, he's getting the toughest matchups each night and plays with 3rd-4th line forwards...he's not exactly in a favorable spot to put up huge numbers
Hughes wasn't given top line minutes and favorable deployment for most, if not the entirety, of his rookie year, IIRC.
With that said, I wouldn't be upset with the kid having a Hughes-like development arc. I think he will come around quicker than that, though.
I think you think that I'm arguing Bedard's rookie season is/will be comparable to Hughes'. I'm not.I don’t care. Hughes was invisible and a complete non factor for a large portion of his rookie season. Bedard is very clearly the best forward on the hawks to anybody with a working brain. And top line minutes on the hawks is like third line minutes on most good teams.
Kane wouldn't be playing right now anyway, do people just completely forget he is injured?Never thought I would think this at this point but having Toews and Kane right now would be pretty helpful. Toews to just win a few draws, some board battles, and settle everything down a bit down the middle. Kane to pair with either Reichel or Bedard to give them some time and puck possession.
Thanks for the info.Kane wouldn't be playing right now anyway, do people just completely forget he is injured?
Thanks for the info.
I said I didnt think I would feel like they would be a be helpful to this team at this point. Not we need to sign and injured Kane.
I did not say we need to sign an injured Kane or a sick/retired Toews. Just saying I didnt think they would miss their presence but a stabilizing big faceoff winning center and a puck possession offensive forward is kind of what they are missing. Also two guys that may have helped the powerplay if around.
Thats not what you said. You said "having them at this point would be helpful" ....but it wouldn't, because Kane wouldn't be playing.Never thought I would think this at this point but having Toews and Kane right now would be pretty helpful. Toews to just win a few draws, some board battles, and settle everything down a bit down the middle. Kane to pair with either Reichel or Bedard to give them some time and puck possession.
And Toews cant keep up with the best teams in the league anymore, so outside of faceoffs he wouldnt be bringing anything right now either.Thats not what you said. You said "having them at this point would be helpful" ....but it wouldn't, because Kane wouldn't be playing.
And we already have Perreault working with our Cs.And Toews cant keep up with the best teams in the league anymore, so outside of faceoffs he wouldnt be bringing anything right now either.
Totally not daydreaming about what it would be like to have the 100+ point version of 88 feeding beautiful passes to 98.
Maybe I'll buy the next NHL game and try and make that happen on franchise mode
Neither would Toews.....Thats not what you said. You said "having them at this point would be helpful" ....but it wouldn't, because Kane wouldn't be playing.