bruins4thecup65
Registered User
- Jun 27, 2011
- 4,126
- 2,031
To Boston : Mathew Tkachuk
To Calgary: 1rst round pick, Vaakanen and Jake Debrusk
To Calgary: 1rst round pick, Vaakanen and Jake Debrusk
Ummm no, thats not really remotely close.To Boston : Mathew Tkachuk
To Calgary: 1rst round pick, Vaakanen and Jake Debrusk
What more would it take?Ummm no, thats not really remotely close.
PastaWhat more would it take?
Tkatchuk is about as available as Pasta. So either overpay handsomely or there is no deal to be made. But imagine Tkatchuk and Marchand on the same team holyTo Boston : Mathew Tkachuk
To Calgary: 1rst round pick, Vaakanen and Jake Debrusk
lol fantasy landTo Boston : Mathew Tkachuk
To Calgary: 1rst round pick, Vaakanen and Jake Debrusk
If we needed to trade Tkachuk that badly we would be going for Eichel, not the trash proposal you put in the OPTkachuk's ice time is down dramatically under Sutter. Doesn't look like CGY is playoff bound and needs to blow it up. Sellers and rebuilding according to Sportsnet everyone is available.
Tkachuk's ice time is down dramatically under Sutter. Doesn't look like CGY is playoff bound and needs to blow it up. Sellers and rebuilding according to Sportsnet everyone is available.
Tkachuk's ice time is down dramatically under Sutter. Doesn't look like CGY is playoff bound and needs to blow it up. Sellers and rebuilding according to Sportsnet everyone is available.
I understand the op offer is bad but no reason to double down and make it worse. Mt isn’t in pasta classPasta
Lol. Tkachuk would thrive in Boston. Marchand and him would be nasty together. Don't see a fit though.I want to will this into existence so badly. Matt would be amazing in Boston. Alas, the posters are right, the Bruins don't have the futures to make it compelling and their young good players (Pasta and McAvoy) are more valuable than Tkachuk so it can't work. Having Marchand and Tkachuk on the LW for 40 minutes a night. PLEASE.
Pasta has definitely stepped it up the last couple of years but Tkachuk just turned 23 and is 6th in LW scoring since entering the league. By comparison, Pasta is 7th in RW scoring since joining the NHL. There's also a world of difference playing with Marchand/Bergeron compared to Backlund/Frolik/Mangiapane, primarily. Not saying it would ever happen but realistically, Pasta and McAvoy are the only age comparable players on the Bruins roster, that would get a conversation started.I understand the op offer is bad but no reason to double down and make it worse. Mt isn’t in pasta class
We could probably include them as well as long as a 7th round pick is returned to us.I don't see Calgary doing this deal.. throw in Wagner and Moore as well.
The most tiresome excuse it never ends. If you have every watched pasta play he could carry any line in hockey. It doesn’t matter who he plays with he would produce no matter what. He’s value is significantly higher compared to MTPasta has definitely stepped it up the last couple of years but Tkachuk just turned 23 and is 6th in LW scoring since entering the league. By comparison, Pasta is 7th in RW scoring since joining the NHL. There's also a world of difference playing with Marchand/Bergeron compared to Backlund/Frolik/Mangiapane, primarily. Not saying it would ever happen but realistically, Pasta and McAvoy are the only age comparable players on the Bruins roster, that would get a conversation started.
Also MT wouldn’t land you either of those two I’m not knocking him at all. Also pasta over the last 4 years is 3 in points of all rw.Pasta has definitely stepped it up the last couple of years but Tkachuk just turned 23 and is 6th in LW scoring since entering the league. By comparison, Pasta is 7th in RW scoring since joining the NHL. There's also a world of difference playing with Marchand/Bergeron compared to Backlund/Frolik/Mangiapane, primarily. Not saying it would ever happen but realistically, Pasta and McAvoy are the only age comparable players on the Bruins roster, that would get a conversation started.