I agree they have played their role well, no poblem with their play in that context. Just not sure why we have to resign ourselves to those roles being more valuable than adding more skill. I think a line with Petan and Roslo has a much better opportunity to outscore their opposition than Hendricks and Tanev. I like that role better.
I agree. But a few small differences:
Petan and Roslovic are not the same. Roslo is actually fast and way more effective defensively. I'd love replacing Tanev with him if he played PK in the NHL already... Not yet but someday I'm sure. I think Roslo may have earned himself a spot on this team already. He's leapfrogged Dano Petan Lemieux Matthias for sure.
Most people here dont care, but I do feel there is something to Hendricks presence on the bench, helping control the young guys, and the fearless blocks he has sometimes.
Not to mention he hasn't been that bad himself 5 on 5. Hes a pretty smart player, just slow. Team chemistry is a big thing and he seems to help it. A few corsi percentage points for a 8 min per game role 5 on 5 doesn't move the needle for me much.
I think we pretty much agree but I wanted to make sure I got that off my chest again.